<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg"
    name="new_checklist,_OhJKUNWsEduaE6F4-SvXzg" guid="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg" changeDate="2008-08-12T16:20:23.127-0700"
    version="1.0.0">
  <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
    Appropriate divergence from the quality criteria described here could be worthy of a comment in the implementation so&#xD;
    that developers examining the code in the future know why the exception occurred.&#xD;
&lt;/p></mainDescription>
  <sections xmi:id="_etwusZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation conforms to the architecture and design"
      guid="_etwusZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Is the implementation structured as specified in the design?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Are all of the functions in the design implemented?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Are all of the interfaces in the design implemented according to their specifications?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Does the implementation adhere to all design and architectural constraints?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_etwutJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is testable"
      guid="_etwutJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Can you test the expected behavior at the unit level?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Is the code written in a way that all paths can be exercised?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_etwutZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is correct"
      guid="_etwutZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Does the implementation pass all of the developer tests?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Does the implementation support the acceptance criteria of the test cases?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
    &lt;li>&#xD;
        Is all code executable (no dead code areas)?&#xD;
    &lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_etwus501EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is understandable"
      guid="_etwus501EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
    Is the logic clearly specified?&amp;nbsp; Have comments been used&amp;nbsp;sparingly to add clarity, and not to make up for&#xD;
    unclear code?&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="There is no redundancy" guid="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
    Is there no redundancy in the implementation? (Identify candidates for refactoring.)&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
  </sections>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>