blob: b51ff43fed7cbf7e22eddd5ac2d7289ed5886d6a [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="_NqYIcqeqEdmKDbQuyzCoqQ"
name="test_script,_0ZfMEMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw" guid="_NqYIcqeqEdmKDbQuyzCoqQ" changeDate="2008-08-15T12:55:57.437-0700"
version="7.2.0">
<purpose>&lt;p> &#xD;
Test scripts implement a subset of required tests in an efficient and effective&#xD;
manner. &lt;/p></purpose>
<impactOfNotHaving>Without&#xD;
this artifact, it is difficult to ensure that tests are run consistently so&#xD;
that results are repeatable and errors can be recreated. If you do not use&#xD;
a test script, it is more difficult to verify that errors were not caused&#xD;
because of the way tests were run.</impactOfNotHaving>
<reasonsForNotNeeding>&lt;p&#xD;
>This artifact might not be required if the tests are simple or if testing&#xD;
is done on an informal basis. However, for this approach to be successful,&#xD;
testers must track their processes, as they might need to recreate a problem&#xD;
scenario. Alternatively, you can use automatic capture and playback tools&#xD;
&lt;?Pub Caret?>to provide a record of testing. &lt;/p></reasonsForNotNeeding>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription>