blob: c84168ca6d78b34ed59144d1cebd994bad5039aa [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-kQg7MSGPB3RPjrplyxwimQ"
name="uc_model,_W2SgEDR5EdutE_HNDTJk5Q" guid="-kQg7MSGPB3RPjrplyxwimQ" changeDate="2008-08-15T12:59:12.171-0700"
version="1.0.0">
<purpose>&lt;p>This&#xD;
artifact presents an overview of the intended behavior of the system. It is&#xD;
the basis for agreement between stakeholders and the project team in regards&#xD;
to the intended functionality of the system. It also guides various tasks&#xD;
in the software development lifecycle. &lt;/p></purpose>
<impactOfNotHaving>Without&#xD;
this artifact, it is difficult to determine all of the relationships between&#xD;
actors and use cases. It is also difficult to gain an understanding of how&#xD;
different use cases relate.</impactOfNotHaving>
<reasonsForNotNeeding>&lt;p&#xD;
> You might not need this requirement if the overall set of use cases is small&#xD;
and has no complex relationships. &lt;/p> &lt;p> You also might not need a use-case&#xD;
model if you use an alternative approach to document functional requirements. &lt;/p></reasonsForNotNeeding>
<representationOptions>&lt;p&#xD;
>Representation options include reports and diagrams from UML modeling tools,&#xD;
graphical representations created by using drawing tools, and drawings on&#xD;
whiteboards. &lt;?Pub Caret?>Most of the information in the use-case model is&#xD;
captured in the use-case specifications. &lt;/p></representationOptions>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription>