blob: 6c012bc4fd1b313c6d29c4ae04483f7b049c6542 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-EytH4BCNGiHF6pZrp8ISCw"
name="new_concept,_eFElAOK2EdqHEo0wLIc5jg" guid="-EytH4BCNGiHF6pZrp8ISCw" authors="Mark Dickson"
changeDate="2006-07-07T04:53:04.786-0700" changeDescription="First Draft" version="1.0">
<mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
Not all requirements have equal significance in the architecture.&amp;nbsp;Some play an important role in determining the&#xD;
architecture of the system, but others do not.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
Deciding whether a specific requirement is architecturally significant is often a matter of judgment. Typically, these&#xD;
are requirements that are technically challenging, technically constraining, or central to the system's purpose.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
These are good examples of Architecturally Significant Requirements:&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
The system must record every modification to customer records for audit purposes.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
The system must respond within 5 seconds.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
The system must&amp;nbsp;deploy on Microsoft Windows XP and Linux.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
The system must encrypt all network traffic.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
The ATM system must dispense cash on&amp;nbsp;demand&amp;nbsp;to validated account holders with sufficient cleared funds.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&lt;br /></mainDescription>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>