blob: 6d03b3d82b8e503e0d8f3e87ebd4d937c488e952 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg"
name="new_checklist,_7BZa0DIdEduDTv4Y1akVTA" guid="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg" changeDate="2006-08-22T13:38:14.915-0700"
version="7.2.0">
<sections xmi:id="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all potential risks to the project been identified?"
guid="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have you involved the team and stakeholders in risk identification?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have you made sure that several categories were considered (technical, project management, organizational, and&#xD;
external)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
List all potential risks, giving a description and type (direct or indirect). See &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot;&#xD;
href=&quot;./../../../core.mgmt.common.extend_supp/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html&quot;&#xD;
guid=&quot;_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw&quot;>Concept: Risk&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;for more information.&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Have all risks been described without ambiguity?"
guid="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g">
<sectionDescription>Is each risk described in a clear and concise way?</sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all major risks been evaluated?"
guid="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Has the team assessed the order of magnitude of&amp;nbsp; each risk (probability x impact)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have the risks been sorted according to their magnitude? This&amp;nbsp;allows you to address the higher-magnitude risks&#xD;
early in the project.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Has a response strategy been chosen for higher-magnitude risks?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
See &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot; href=&quot;./../../../core.mgmt.common.extend_supp/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html&quot;&#xD;
guid=&quot;_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw&quot;>Concept: Risk&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot;&#xD;
href=&quot;./../../../core.mgmt.common.extend_supp/guidances/guidelines/managing_risks_B1256EB4.html&quot;&#xD;
guid=&quot;_VNxL4ACsEdu8m4dIntu6jA&quot;>Guideline: Managing Risks&lt;/a> for more information.&#xD;
&lt;/p></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Are there interdependencies between risks?"
guid="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;span style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial&quot;>Make sure that you establish interdependencies between risks as&#xD;
appropriate. For example, the consequence of a risk happening may raise the probability of another risk happening or raise&#xD;
the impact that another risk could have on the project. If risks depend on each other, you may need a response strategy to&#xD;
mitigate&amp;nbsp;all interdependent risks&amp;nbsp;at the same time, or you may need revisit the risk list to update the magnitude&#xD;
of dependent risks.&lt;/span></sectionDescription>
</sections>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>