blob: 72a473848c90f6bb904d781d10688f40e6c03644 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-kw2vYHKDkWv2tZrDMrBPNA"
name="new_checklist,_Vael8CGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A" guid="-kw2vYHKDkWv2tZrDMrBPNA" version="1.0.0">
<sections xmi:id="_kTZiACGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A" name="Global functional requirements have been captured and validated"
guid="_kTZiACGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are functional requirements that affect multiple use cases identified? For example, all use cases may be subject to&#xD;
access control, audit trails, general responses to abnormal situations (overflow, communication facilities, error&#xD;
handling and recovery and so on).&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
For each of these requirements, are they behavioral and could be better captured in a common use case?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
For each of these functions, is it clear how input and shared data generate output and shared data?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_-eJXoCGMEdu5QMD9IAHRNg" name="Usability requirements have been captured and validated"
guid="_-eJXoCGMEdu5QMD9IAHRNg">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have the efficiency and usability factors of user tasks been considered?&amp;nbsp;&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are the requirements specified in a way that is verifiable, including metrics and target values?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have&amp;nbsp;novice as well as expert users been considered?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_QCbtwCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Reliability requirements have been captured and validated"
guid="_QCbtwCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have reliability requirements been specified as measurable requirements or prioritized design goals?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Is error checking and recovery required?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are undesired events considered and their required responses specified?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are initial or special states considered (such as cold starts or abnormal termination)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_e3pOgCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Performance requirements have been captured and validated"
guid="_e3pOgCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have the resource and performance margin requirements been stated (for example speed, response time, recovery time&#xD;
of various software functions)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_l8CeUCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Supportability requirements have been captured and validated"
guid="_l8CeUCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are there any requirements that will enhance the supportability or maintainability of the system being built?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_wIttsCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Constraints have been captured and validated"
guid="_wIttsCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are there any required standards in effect, implementation language, policies for database integrity, resource&#xD;
limits, operating environments, and so forth?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Has the use of inherited design or code or pre-selected tools been specified?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_5j6c0CGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="External interfaces have been identified"
guid="_5j6c0CGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Is it clear how the software interacts with people, the system's hardware, other hardware, and other software?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have all critical data elements that cross system boundaries been identified for those scenarios that will be&#xD;
implemented&amp;nbsp;next?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_H052MCGOEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Business rules have been captured and validated"
guid="_H052MCGOEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Are the rules relevant to the use cases identified (data validation rules, formulas, flow decisions)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
<sections xmi:id="_NBM78CGOEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Applicable standards and regulatory compliance requirements have been identified"
guid="_NBM78CGOEdubdKsr57an1g">
<sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
Have all requirements derived from existing standard and regulations been specified?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
</sections>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>