blob: 32e47e0ef3952e7bf23b83e3c38e58585e5908b7 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-w7sImtXWkf4HDXdUWjRsUg"
name="new_guideline,_fnZj0NVXEdqy9sbRhejO5Q" guid="-w7sImtXWkf4HDXdUWjRsUg" authors="Chris Sibbald"
changeDate="2007-02-26T10:52:05.226-0800" changeDescription="Moved content from previous concept:change request to this guideline and updated in accordance with discussion from April 18, 2006 telecon."
version="0.2">
<mainDescription>&lt;h3>&#xD;
Background&#xD;
&lt;/h3>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
Change requests typically have a lifecycle. They are raised, reviewed, accepted or rejected, implemented, verified,&#xD;
and closed. These states define the status of the change request at a particular point in time, and represent critical&#xD;
information for tracking progress. Other sets of states are possible.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
During review of a change request, the goal is to assess the technical, cost, and schedule impact&#xD;
of implementing the change. The technical impact assessment includes the determination of&#xD;
which work products are affected and an estimate of the level of effort required to change and verify all&#xD;
affected artifacts. This information becomes the basis of the cost and schedule impact assessments and, ultimately,&#xD;
whether the change request will be accepted or rejected.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
If accepted, the implementation and verification of the change request will be assigned to an iteration in the same&#xD;
manner as any other work item.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
The current process uses the &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot; href=&quot;./../../../core.mgmt.common.extend_supp/workproducts/work_items_list_39D03CC8.html&quot; guid=&quot;_rGNWsCbSEdqh1LYUOGRh2A&quot;>Artifact: Work Items List&lt;/a> to capture, prioritize, and track the change requests&#xD;
using the attributes defined for that artifact.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;h3>&#xD;
Submitting change requests&#xD;
&lt;/h3>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
When submitting a change request, provide as much information as possible to enable a speedy review and&#xD;
disposition. At a minimum, all change requests should include the following information:&#xD;
&lt;/p>&#xD;
&lt;ul>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>ID:&lt;/strong> A unique identifier for the change request to simplify tracking. If you are using some&#xD;
form of change tracking tool the tool will assign a unique ID.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>Brief Description:&lt;/strong> A name that summarizes the change request.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>Detailed Description:&lt;/strong> A detailed description of the change request. For a defect, if you&#xD;
can provide information that will help reproduce the defect please do so. For an enhancement request, provide&#xD;
a rationale for the request.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>Affected Item:&lt;/strong> The affected artifact and version.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>Severity:&lt;/strong> How severe is this issue (show stopper, nice to have, and so on)?&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;li>&#xD;
&lt;strong>Priority:&lt;/strong> How important this request is, in your opinion.&#xD;
&lt;/li>&#xD;
&lt;/ul>&#xD;
&lt;p>&#xD;
Depending upon the system you are using, the names of these data elements may differ. However, this information&#xD;
is required, in one form or another, to permit speedy review and disposition of the change request.&#xD;
&lt;/p>&lt;br />&#xD;
&lt;br />&#xD;
&lt;br /></mainDescription>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>