| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
| <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0" |
| xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore" |
| xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg" |
| name="new_checklist,_7BZa0DIdEduDTv4Y1akVTA" guid="-gqNN4DnROmJpgKtrdguhpg" changeDate="2006-08-22T13:38:14.915-0700"> |
| <sections xmi:id="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all potential risks to the project been identified?" |
| guid="_qO41ADIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA"> |
| <sectionDescription><ul>
 |
| 
 |
| <li> Have you identified anything that could deter you on the path to the project 
 |
| success?&nbsp; </li>
 |
| <li>
 |
| Have you involved the team and stakeholders in risk identification?
 |
| </li>
 |
| 
 |
| <li> Have you made sure that several categories were considered (technical, 
 |
| project management, organizational, and external)? </li>
 |
| </ul>
 |
| <p>
 |
| List all potential risks, giving a description and type (direct or indirect). See <a class="elementLinkWithType" href="./../../../openup/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html" guid="_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw">Concept: Risk</a>&nbsp;for
 |
| more information.
 |
| </p></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Have all risks been described without ambiguity?" |
| guid="_5RiSkDe2EduD7J48kKN20g"> |
| <sectionDescription>Are risks captured and described in a clear, concise, and unambiguous way? Also 
 |
| follow these rules when describing response strategies for risks. This will help 
 |
| you avoid unnecessary work and -- more importantly -- increase the probability 
 |
| that risks are effectively identified and managed.</sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA" name="Have all major risks been evaluated?" |
| guid="_2rpQoDIfEduDTv4Y1akVTA"> |
| <sectionDescription><ul>
 |
| 
 |
| <li>
 |
| 
 |
| Has the team assessed the order of magnitude of&nbsp; each risk (probability x impact)?
 |
| 
 |
| </li>
 |
| 
 |
| 
 |
| <li> Have the risks been sorted according to their magnitude? This&nbsp;allows 
 |
| you to address the higher-magnitude risks early in the project. </li>
 |
| 
 |
| 
 |
| <li> Has a response strategy been chosen for higher-magnitude risks? </li>
 |
| 
 |
| </ul>
 |
| 
 |
| <p>
 |
| 
 |
| See <a class="elementLinkWithType" href="./../../../openup/guidances/concepts/risk_AF5840DA.html" guid="_0bsLgMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw">Concept: Risk</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a class="elementLinkWithType" href="./../../../openup/guidances/guidelines/risk_management_B1256EB4.html" guid="_VNxL4ACsEdu8m4dIntu6jA">Guideline: Managing Risks</a> for more information.
 |
| 
 |
| </p></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g" name="Are there interdependencies between risks?" |
| guid="_hSFaYDe3EduD7J48kKN20g"> |
| <sectionDescription><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Make sure that you establish 
 |
| interdependencies between risks as appropriate. For example, the consequence of 
 |
| a risk happening may raise the probability of another risk happening or raise 
 |
| the impact that another risk could have on the project. If risks depend on each 
 |
| other, you may need a response strategy to mitigate&nbsp;all interdependent risks&nbsp;at 
 |
| the same time, or you may need revisit the risk list to update the magnitude of 
 |
| dependent risks.</span></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| </org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription> |
