<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0" xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.3/uma.ecore" epf:version="1.0.0" xmi:id="-kw2vYHKDkWv2tZrDMrBPNA" name="new_checklist,_Vael8CGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A" guid="-kw2vYHKDkWv2tZrDMrBPNA" version="1.0.0">
  <sections xmi:id="_kTZiACGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A" name="Have global Functional requirements that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_kTZiACGMEdu3VKXZx45D3A">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are functional requirements that affect multiple Use Cases identified? For example, all Use Cases may be subject to
        access control, audit trail, general responses to abnormal situations (overflow, communication facilities, error
        handling and recovery) and so on.
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        For each of these requirements, are they behavioral and better captured in a common Use Case?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        For each of these functions, is it clear how input and shared data generate output and shared data?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_-eJXoCGMEdu5QMD9IAHRNg" name="Have Usability requirements that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_-eJXoCGMEdu5QMD9IAHRNg">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have the efficiency and usability factors of user tasks been considered?&amp;nbsp;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are the requirements specified in a way that is verifiable, including metrics and target values?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have&amp;nbsp;novice as well as expert users been considered?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_QCbtwCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have Reliability requirements that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_QCbtwCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have reliability requirements been specified as measurable requirements or prioritized design goals?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Is error checking and recovery required?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are undesired events considered and their required responses specified?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are initial or special states considered (such as cold starts or abnormal termination)?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_e3pOgCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have Performance requirements that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_e3pOgCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have the resource and performance margin requirements been stated (speed, response time, recovery time of various
        software functions)?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_l8CeUCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have Supportability requirements that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_l8CeUCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are there any requirements that will enhance the supportability or maintainability of the system being built?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_wIttsCGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have Constraints that must be considered in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_wIttsCGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are there any required standards in effect, implementation language, policies for database integrity, resource
        limits, operating environment(s), etc.?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Has the use of inherited design or code or pre-selected tools been specified?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_5j6c0CGNEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have External Interfaces that must be considered in the next iteration been identified?" guid="_5j6c0CGNEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Is it clear how the software interacts with people, the system's hardware, other hardware, and other software?
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have all critical data elements that cross system boundaries been identified for those scenarios that will be
        implemented in the next iteration?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_H052MCGOEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have Business Rules that will be implemented in the next iteration been captured and validated?" guid="_H052MCGOEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Are the rules relevant to the use cases identified (data validation rules, formulas, flow decisions)?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
  <sections xmi:id="_NBM78CGOEdubdKsr57an1g" name="Have applicable Standards and Regulatory Compliance requirements that must be considered in the next iteration been identified?" guid="_NBM78CGOEdubdKsr57an1g">
    <sectionDescription>&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;
        Have all requirements derived from existing standard and regulations been specified?
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</sectionDescription>
  </sections>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>