diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/developer_test.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/developer_test.xmi
index efe6de2..5c96f91 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/developer_test.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/developer_test.xmi
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-zD7XGTc4k1GFe4PvMKlkKA"
-    name="new_checklist,_dxaPUF-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" guid="-zD7XGTc4k1GFe4PvMKlkKA" changeDate="2008-07-31T21:23:44.406-0700">
-  <sections xmi:id="_rZ3pEF-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Is the test coverage is acceptable?"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-zD7XGTc4k1GFe4PvMKlkKA"
+    name="new_checklist,_dxaPUF-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" guid="-zD7XGTc4k1GFe4PvMKlkKA" changeDate="2008-07-31T21:23:44.406-0700"
+    version="7.5.0">
+  <sections xmi:id="_rZ3pEF-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="The test coverage is acceptable"
       guid="_rZ3pEF-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
     100% test coverage is the ideal, but there may occassionally be places where it's impossible to achieve total coverage.&#xD;
@@ -12,20 +13,18 @@
     on a developer's machine. Every reasonable effort should be made to cover all the code.&#xD;
 &lt;/p></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_7ncD4F-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Are developer test names or IDs are consistent with project naming conventions?"
+  <sections xmi:id="_7ncD4F-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Developer test names or IDs are consistent with project naming conventions"
       guid="_7ncD4F-BEd2T0JdVjRyaQA"/>
-  <sections xmi:id="_0nZTIF-CEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Is the test logic is correct?"
-      guid="_0nZTIF-CEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
+  <sections xmi:id="_0nZTIF-CEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="The test logic is correct" guid="_0nZTIF-CEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
     Assure the test themselves are correct.&#xD;
 &lt;/p></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_KfXE8F-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Is the branch coverage is acceptable."
+  <sections xmi:id="_KfXE8F-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Branch coverage is acceptable."
       guid="_KfXE8F-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
     <sectionDescription>Assure conditional logic been tested in all combinations.&lt;br /></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_UNewEF-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="Is the test is easy to maintain?"
-      guid="_UNewEF-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
+  <sections xmi:id="_UNewEF-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA" name="The test is easy to maintain" guid="_UNewEF-DEd2T0JdVjRyaQA">
     <sectionDescription>Has the test been implemented to account for expected ongoing changes in the application state, such as system date fields,&#xD;
 transaction numbers, and so on?&lt;br /></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
index 20fef1d..ec3f32f 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
-    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.2.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
-    rmc:version="7.2.0" xmi:id="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg"
+    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg"
     name="new_checklist,_OhJKUNWsEduaE6F4-SvXzg" guid="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg" changeDate="2007-07-25T12:48:32.932-0700"
     version="1.0.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@
     Appropriate divergence from the quality criteria described here could be worthy of a comment in the implementation so&#xD;
     that developers examining the code in the future know why the exception occurred.&#xD;
 &lt;/p></mainDescription>
-  <sections xmi:id="_etwusZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="Does the implementation conform to the architecture and design?"
+  <sections xmi:id="_etwusZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation conforms to the architecture and design"
       guid="_etwusZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
-  &lt;li> Is the implementation structured as specified in the design? &lt;/li>&#xD;
-  &lt;li> Are all of the functions in the design implemented? &lt;/li>&#xD;
-  &lt;li> Are all of the interfaces in the design implemented according to their &#xD;
-    specifications? &lt;/li>&#xD;
-  &lt;li> Does the implementation adhere to all design and architectural constraints? &#xD;
-  &lt;/li>&#xD;
+    &lt;li>&#xD;
+        Is the implementation structured as specified in the design?&#xD;
+    &lt;/li>&#xD;
+    &lt;li>&#xD;
+        Are all of the functions in the design implemented?&#xD;
+    &lt;/li>&#xD;
+    &lt;li>&#xD;
+        Are all of the interfaces in the design implemented according to their specifications?&#xD;
+    &lt;/li>&#xD;
+    &lt;li>&#xD;
+        Does the implementation adhere to all design and architectural constraints?&#xD;
+    &lt;/li>&#xD;
 &lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_etwutJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="Is the implementation testable?"
+  <sections xmi:id="_etwutJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is testable"
       guid="_etwutJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
@@ -42,7 +48,7 @@
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
 &lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_etwutZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="Is the implementation correct?"
+  <sections xmi:id="_etwutZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is correct"
       guid="_etwutZ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
@@ -56,13 +62,14 @@
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
 &lt;/ul></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_etwus501EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="Is the implementation understandable?"
+  <sections xmi:id="_etwus501EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="The implementation is understandable"
       guid="_etwus501EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
-    Is there no redundancy in the implementation? (Identify candidates for refactoring.)&#xD;
+    Is the logic clearly specified?&amp;nbsp; Have comments been used&amp;nbsp;sparingly to add clarity, and not to make up for&#xD;
+    unclear code?&#xD;
 &lt;/p></sectionDescription>
   </sections>
-  <sections xmi:id="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="Is there no redundancy?" guid="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
+  <sections xmi:id="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw" name="There is no redundancy" guid="_etwusp01EdyQ3oTO93enUw">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
     Is there no redundancy in the implementation? (Identify candidates for refactoring.)&#xD;
 &lt;/p></sectionDescription>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/concepts/developer_testing.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/concepts/developer_testing.xmi
index 17f6673..ba4c47a 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/concepts/developer_testing.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/concepts/developer_testing.xmi
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-EOoqKeF2SEXao6XhNXBD-w"
-    name=",_ADwlAJRtEdyrdaw_xGakyw" guid="-EOoqKeF2SEXao6XhNXBD-w" changeDate="2008-05-24T15:58:50.691-0700"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-EOoqKeF2SEXao6XhNXBD-w"
+    name=",_ADwlAJRtEdyrdaw_xGakyw" guid="-EOoqKeF2SEXao6XhNXBD-w" changeDate="2008-08-11T09:09:21.312-0700"
     version="7.2.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
     Developer testing is the act of regression testing source code by developers. This is sometimes called &quot;unit regression&#xD;
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@
         you might not be believed.&#xD;
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Test to the risk. The riskier something is, the more it needs to be reviewed and tested. In other words you should&#xD;
-        invest significant effort testing in the algorithm for estimating radiation doses but nowhere near as much effort&#xD;
-        testing the &quot;change font size&quot; function of the same application.&#xD;
+        Test to the risk. The riskier something is, the more it needs to be reviewed and tested. For example, you should&#xD;
+        invest significantly more&amp;nbsp;effort testing a safety-critical algorithm for measuring radiation doses, and far&#xD;
+        less effort testing the &quot;change font size&quot; function of the same application.&#xD;
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
         You can validate all artifacts. You can test all your artifacts, not just your source code, although the focus of&#xD;
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/termdefinitions/architecture.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/termdefinitions/architecture.xmi
index 1f84a99..94925c4 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/termdefinitions/architecture.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/termdefinitions/architecture.xmi
@@ -1,15 +1,13 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
-    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.2.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
-    rmc:version="7.2.0" xmi:id="-YMvJ5LwexkcVWWqLdm5-nQ"
-    name=",_siyjEEvCEdunZcj9T5hrMQ" guid="-YMvJ5LwexkcVWWqLdm5-nQ" version="7.2.0">
+    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-YMvJ5LwexkcVWWqLdm5-nQ"
+    name=",_siyjEEvCEdunZcj9T5hrMQ" guid="-YMvJ5LwexkcVWWqLdm5-nQ" changeDate="2008-08-11T10:02:44.281-0700"
+    version="7.2.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
     Describes the blueprint for software development, frequently represented using a number of architectural views. It also&#xD;
-    contains the rationale, assumptions, explanations and implications of the decisions that where made in forming the&#xD;
+    contains the rationale, assumptions, explanations and implications of the decisions that were made in forming the&#xD;
     architecture as well as the global mapping between views.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
-    [*** I'm not sure we should mention &quot;views&quot; in this basic definition of architecture. Thoughts? ***]&#xD;
 &lt;/p></mainDescription>
 </org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/checklists/architecture_notebook.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/checklists/architecture_notebook.xmi
index 97e0509..a140fec 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/checklists/architecture_notebook.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/checklists/architecture_notebook.xmi
@@ -1,21 +1,11 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
-    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.2.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
-    rmc:version="7.2.0" xmi:id="_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw"
+    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw"
     name="architecture,_17PYUNd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw" guid="_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw" authors="Chris Doyle, Mark Dickson"
-    changeDate="2008-02-11T11:59:58.984-0500" changeDescription="(Mark Dickson) formatted &amp; applied changes from Chris Doyle "
+    changeDate="2008-08-11T10:07:36.984-0700" changeDescription="(Mark Dickson) formatted &amp; applied changes from Chris Doyle "
     version="1.2">
-  <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
-    The items in this checklist represent good practices for creating and communicating a robust architecture. It may not&#xD;
-    be possible to address every item, and you may be able to address some items to only a limited extent. In these cases,&#xD;
-    be sure that there are good reasons for only partially addressing an item or not addressing an item at all.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
-    Architectural revisions can occur every day. Use this checklist regularly to ensure that the results are robust,&#xD;
-    consistent, and understandable. Make the architecture good enough for the specific goals being addressed by using this&#xD;
-    checklist to identify areas that have been skipped, ignored, or not sufficiently addressed.&#xD;
-&lt;/p></mainDescription>
   <sections xmi:id="_MN7hMNjcEdydTt3eL7YyCQ" name="Is the architecture understandable?"
       guid="_MN7hMNjcEdydTt3eL7YyCQ">
     <sectionDescription>&lt;ul>&#xD;
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/roadmaps/how_to_adopt_evolutionary_arch_practice.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/roadmaps/how_to_adopt_evolutionary_arch_practice.xmi
index b3a19ad..8a40763 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/roadmaps/how_to_adopt_evolutionary_arch_practice.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/roadmaps/how_to_adopt_evolutionary_arch_practice.xmi
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-KXvzdy6aJTFPQRS-UK5dvA"
-    name="new_roadmap,_Odpz8NciEdy1nJEYZGzN4A" guid="-KXvzdy6aJTFPQRS-UK5dvA" changeDate="2008-08-08T12:36:43.271-0700"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-KXvzdy6aJTFPQRS-UK5dvA"
+    name="new_roadmap,_Odpz8NciEdy1nJEYZGzN4A" guid="-KXvzdy6aJTFPQRS-UK5dvA" changeDate="2008-08-11T10:28:42.656-0700"
     version="7.2.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;h3>&#xD;
     Getting Started&amp;nbsp;&#xD;
@@ -66,10 +66,9 @@
     more or different information they would like see?&amp;nbsp; Would they like to see less?&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
-    Conversely, don't ignore documenting important decisions. Team members may be close by and you may be in constant&#xD;
-    contact with them, but teams change and architects move on to other projects. Failure to document important decisions&#xD;
-    raises the risk of failure at a later date because future team members don't have the benefit of being involved in&#xD;
-    today's collaborative decisions. Consider future team members as collaborators that you&amp;nbsp;don't have the opportunity&#xD;
-    to speak to face-to-face.&amp;nbsp;&#xD;
+    Document&amp;nbsp;important decisions. Team members may be close by and you may be in constant contact with them, but teams&#xD;
+    change and architects move on to other projects. Failure to document important decisions raises the risk of failure at&#xD;
+    a later date because future team members don't have the benefit of being involved in today's collaborative decisions.&#xD;
+    Consider future team members as collaborators that you&amp;nbsp;don't have the opportunity to speak to face-to-face.&amp;nbsp;&#xD;
 &lt;/p></mainDescription>
 </org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/plugin.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/plugin.xmi
index b80c148..070a999 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/plugin.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/plugin.xmi
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 <xmi:XMI xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
     xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma.resourcemanager="http:///org/eclipse/epf/uma/resourcemanager.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0">
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0">
   <org.eclipse.epf.uma.resourcemanager:ResourceManager xmi:id="_4ggZgbPREduocbW-TPTq7A"
       guid="_4ggZgbPREduocbW-TPTq7A">
     <resourceDescriptors xmi:id="_m_D6YPL5Edm6Nvont3uinw" id="_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw"
@@ -141,8 +141,7 @@
             <optionalInput href="uma://_-bv0ELXuEduGP_98XMd0fg#_Vux8UEfUEdyiPI8btkmvmw"/>
           </contentElements>
           <contentElements xsi:type="org.eclipse.epf.uma:Checklist" xmi:id="_17PYUNd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw"
-              name="architecture_notebook" guid="_17PYUNd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw" presentationName="Architecture Notebook"
-              briefDescription="This checklist provides questions to help in evaluating whether architectural decisions have been captured appropriately.">
+              name="architecture_notebook" guid="_17PYUNd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw" presentationName="Architecture Notebook">
             <presentation xmi:id="_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw" href="uma://_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw#_17Ve8Nd6EdmIm-bsRSNCgw"/>
             <conceptsAndPapers href="uma://_OOB2AAouEdyhlpBPrduOMw#_mzxI0A4LEduibvKwrGxWxA"/>
             <conceptsAndPapers href="uma://_OOB2AAouEdyhlpBPrduOMw#_jdKSsNpiEdyP58ppo1Ieaw"/>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/workproducts/arch_notebook.res.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/workproducts/arch_notebook.res.xmi
index 970cdd2..ba7f470 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/workproducts/arch_notebook.res.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/workproducts/arch_notebook.res.xmi
@@ -1,13 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription xmi:version="2.0"
-    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.2.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
-    rmc:version="7.2.0" xmi:id="-KmIIyuXPr1pe5iREXAoMYw"
+    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-KmIIyuXPr1pe5iREXAoMYw"
     name="arch_notebook.res,_QHYwcM3jEdyjXslGsagg_w" guid="-KmIIyuXPr1pe5iREXAoMYw"
-    changeDate="2008-02-13T19:25:46.828-0500">
-  <representation>&lt;p>&#xD;
-    See &lt;a class=&quot;elementLinkWithType&quot;&#xD;
-    href=&quot;./../../practice.tech.evolutionary_arch.base/guidances/templates/architecture_notebook_BCD3507B.html&quot;&#xD;
-    guid=&quot;_me8WcAANEdyRS9uciXlZ6g&quot;>Template: Architecture Notebook&lt;/a>.&#xD;
-&lt;/p></representation>
-</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription>
+    changeDate="2008-08-11T10:12:15.859-0700" version="7.2.0"/>
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/practices/test_driven_dev.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/practices/test_driven_dev.xmi
index b1829f8..6517282 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/practices/test_driven_dev.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/practices/test_driven_dev.xmi
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:PracticeDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-nV4dgKPmOiwZnl6nUoKqQw"
-    name="new_practice,_FUDtMB4mEd2bS8fFOQ7WWA" guid="-nV4dgKPmOiwZnl6nUoKqQw" changeDate="2008-08-07T16:06:31.635-0700">
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-nV4dgKPmOiwZnl6nUoKqQw"
+    name="new_practice,_FUDtMB4mEd2bS8fFOQ7WWA" guid="-nV4dgKPmOiwZnl6nUoKqQw" changeDate="2008-08-11T09:41:04.953-0700"
+    version="7.5.0">
   <additionalInfo>&lt;p>&#xD;
     If you're just getting started with TDD or developer testing in general, you'll need to know why developer testing is a&#xD;
     good idea and the basics of what makes good developer tests. A good starting place is this &lt;a&#xD;
@@ -48,9 +49,9 @@
     been regression tested, prior to check-in.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
-    Developers use TDD to create the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot;&#xD;
-    href=&quot;./../../../core.tech.slot.base/workproducts/software_implementation_slot_E92F6A39.html&quot;&#xD;
-    guid=&quot;_Vux8UEfUEdyiPI8btkmvmw&quot;>[Software Implementation]&lt;/a> and the &lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot;&#xD;
+    Developers use TDD to create the &lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot;&#xD;
+    href=&quot;./../../../core.tech.common.base/workproducts/implementation_AFFEFC46.html&quot;&#xD;
+    guid=&quot;_JqYbgJ01EdyQ3oTO93enUw&quot;>Implementation&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;and the &lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot;&#xD;
     href=&quot;./../../../core.tech.common.base/workproducts/developer_test_6A91CE05.html&quot;&#xD;
     guid=&quot;_kh9FcJ02EdyQ3oTO93enUw&quot;>Developer Test&lt;/a>s.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/roadmaps/adopt_tdd_practice.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/roadmaps/adopt_tdd_practice.xmi
index 35fbb35..1f740e8 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/roadmaps/adopt_tdd_practice.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/roadmaps/adopt_tdd_practice.xmi
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
-    epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-CGSI-WD83sE5swSmSDjAYA"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-CGSI-WD83sE5swSmSDjAYA"
     name="adopt_tdd_practice,_8yG48JRqEdyrdaw_xGakyw" guid="-CGSI-WD83sE5swSmSDjAYA"
-    authors="Jim Ruehlin" changeDate="2008-08-09T09:01:00.137-0700" version="7.2.0">
+    authors="Jim Ruehlin" changeDate="2008-08-11T09:38:41.046-0700" version="7.2.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;h3>&#xD;
     Getting Started&#xD;
 &lt;/h3>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
-    If you've just installed the Test Driven Development practice, start by reviewing the concepts of &lt;a&#xD;
+    If you've just installed the Test Driven Development (TDD) practice, start by reviewing the concepts of &lt;a&#xD;
     class=&quot;elementLink&quot; href=&quot;./../../../core.tech.common.base/guidances/concepts/developer_testing_FEBDAED6.html&quot;&#xD;
     guid=&quot;_ADwlAJRtEdyrdaw_xGakyw&quot;>Developer Testing&lt;/a>&amp;nbsp;and &lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot;&#xD;
     href=&quot;./../../../practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/concepts/test_driven_development_FA8E27C2.html&quot;&#xD;
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@
      guid=&quot;_t7IacJRmEdyrdaw_xGakyw&quot;>test driven&amp;nbsp;development whitepaper&lt;/a>.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
-    If your organization has never done developer testing before, start your adoption by by educating the members of the&#xD;
-    team. Use the resources below for educational and reference materials. Begin to track your performance immediately as&#xD;
-    that will give you quick feedback on how rapidly the team is adopting TDD, even if it's a very low form of adoption at&#xD;
+    If your organization has never done developer testing before, start your adoption by educating the members of the team.&#xD;
+    Use the resources below for educational and reference materials. Begin to track your performance immediately as that&#xD;
+    will give you quick feedback on how rapidly the team is adopting TDD, even if it's a very low form of adoption at&#xD;
     first.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
@@ -52,19 +52,19 @@
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
     Here's one possible scenario for adopting the TDD practice. You may want to add, change, or&amp;nbsp;remove steps to design&#xD;
-    an adoption roadmap more suitable to your environment. Hiring a consulting experienced in TDD will also speed your&#xD;
+    an adoption roadmap more suitable to your environment. Hiring a consultant experienced in TDD will also speed your&#xD;
     adoption of the practice and help avoid common pitfalls.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;ol>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Educate the team on TDD. Use the presentations and articles referenced on this page as a starting place. It would&#xD;
-        also be helpful for developers to attend a class on developer testing and TDD.&#xD;
+        Educate the team on TDD. Use the presentations and articles referenced in this practice as a starting place. It&#xD;
+        would also be helpful for developers to attend a class on developer testing and TDD.&#xD;
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
         Have the team review the material in this practice.&#xD;
     &lt;/li>&#xD;
     &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Extend this practice to reflect any important constraints or requirments in your organization. For instance,&#xD;
+        Extend this practice to reflect any important constraints or requirements in your organization. For instance,&#xD;
         indicate any extra information that may need to be described when checking in system or test code, link to any&#xD;
         materials that describe internal tools your team is required to use, or create a guideline describing how each test&#xD;
         must be documented or structured to conform to corporate standards.&#xD;
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/tasks/run_developer_tests.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/tasks/run_developer_tests.xmi
index 2b37b75..e8cca9e 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/tasks/run_developer_tests.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/tasks/run_developer_tests.xmi
@@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <org.eclipse.epf.uma:TaskDescription xmi:version="2.0"
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="-H6ob8eA7gz_mOsk8ulSFMQ"
-    name=",_R7atwJfIEdyZkIR-s-Y8wQ" guid="-H6ob8eA7gz_mOsk8ulSFMQ" changeDate="2008-03-11T14:16:41.025-0400"
+    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
+    rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-H6ob8eA7gz_mOsk8ulSFMQ"
+    name=",_R7atwJfIEdyZkIR-s-Y8wQ" guid="-H6ob8eA7gz_mOsk8ulSFMQ" changeDate="2008-08-11T09:32:16.421-0700"
     version="7.2.0">
   <keyConsiderations>&lt;p>&#xD;
     It is common to require that code pass all developer tests before it can be delivered in an integrated source code&#xD;
     repository.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
-    Pair with the Tester during all steps of this task to gain insight on testing and quality considerations.&#xD;
+    Pair with testing experts to gain insight on testing and quality considerations.&#xD;
 &lt;/p>&#xD;
 &lt;p>&#xD;
     The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class=&quot;elementLink&quot; href=&quot;./../../core.mgmt.slot.base/workproducts/project_work_slot_F12BAC46.html&quot;&#xD;