Combined the text in this element with the practice page, as there were redundancies between the two.
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/concepts/test_driven_development.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/concepts/test_driven_development.xmi
deleted file mode 100644
index f5330ef..0000000
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/practice.tech.test_driven_development.base/guidances/concepts/test_driven_development.xmi
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0"
-    xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore"
-    xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.2.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
-    rmc:version="7.2.0" xmi:id="-1ydZfAL3PacfKwqzAF6hUw"
-    name="test_driven_development,_aI-NgJ04EdyQ3oTO93enUw" guid="-1ydZfAL3PacfKwqzAF6hUw"
-    changeDate="2007-11-27T14:32:00.173-0800">
-  <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
-    Test driven development&amp;nbsp;is the practice of writing&amp;nbsp;developer tests and&amp;nbsp;implementation code concurrently&#xD;
-    and at a very fine level of granularity.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
-    In&amp;nbsp;test driven&amp;nbsp;design, the developer first writes a small portion of a&amp;nbsp;developer test, and then writes&#xD;
-    just enough&amp;nbsp;implementation code to make that&amp;nbsp;developer test compile and execute. Then they write a little bit&#xD;
-    more of the test and then add enough code to make that new bit compile and pass. This cycle can last somewhere between&#xD;
-    30 seconds and five minutes. Rarely does it grow to ten minutes. In each cycle, the tests come first. Once a unit test&#xD;
-    is done, the&amp;nbsp;developer goes on to the next test until there are no more tests to be written for the implementation&#xD;
-    of the work item currently under development.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
-    The practice of test driven development changes how&amp;nbsp;the developer&amp;nbsp;thinks. Tests are not written as an&#xD;
-    afterthought. Instead, developer tests are written as part of the everyday, every minute way of building software.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
-    What are&amp;nbsp;the advantages of test driven design?&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;ol>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Assumptions in the design are analyzed before the implementation code is written. To write developer tests, an&#xD;
-        examination must be made of the behavior of each piece of code to be written, correct and incorrect behaviors must&#xD;
-        be defined. In&amp;nbsp;a way, writing the tests before the code can be considered a version of detailed design.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Code units designed&amp;nbsp;for testability up front are cleaner and more loosely coupled.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        Errors&amp;nbsp;are found earlier. Errors or gaps in the requirements and design are identified before coding begins&#xD;
-        when it could be more tempting to move ahead based on assumptions.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        A clearer&amp;nbsp;collaboration strategy between the developer and others that might be responsible for the&#xD;
-        requirements, architecture, and design is put in place.&amp;nbsp;During the creation of the tests, there must be a&#xD;
-        meeting of the minds as to what&amp;nbsp;has been specified. After that, the implementation can carry on with&#xD;
-        confidence that there is a shared vision of what the code should do.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        There are unambiguous criteria for completion of the code. When the tests pass, the code is working as specified.&#xD;
-        Non-functional quality dimensions can be dealt with separately, but there is a clear moment when the code behaves&#xD;
-        correctly.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        The technique drives the developer to work in smaller increments with faster quality feedback. At any time the&#xD;
-        developer is just one test away from having error-free code.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-    &lt;li>&#xD;
-        There is a separation of concerns and effort between getting code working and improving the quality of the code&#xD;
-        that already runs correctly. Separating out these two areas of concern provides focus and time management support&#xD;
-        to a developer who in one pass over the implementation makes it pass the tests as simply as possible and then in a&#xD;
-        subsequent pass, looks for areas to improve.&#xD;
-    &lt;/li>&#xD;
-&lt;/ol></mainDescription>
-</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription>