Minor review changes - removed poor description text from checklists
diff --git a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
index ec3f32f..7ad8e5d 100644
--- a/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
+++ b/libraries/EPF_Practices_Library/core.tech.common.base/guidances/checklists/implementation.xmi
@@ -3,15 +3,9 @@
     xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
     xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" epf:version="1.5.0" xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc"
     rmc:version="7.5.0" xmi:id="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg"
-    name="new_checklist,_OhJKUNWsEduaE6F4-SvXzg" guid="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg" changeDate="2007-07-25T12:48:32.932-0700"
+    name="new_checklist,_OhJKUNWsEduaE6F4-SvXzg" guid="-cev1w72zE7XqPYsSv19prg" changeDate="2008-08-11T12:18:16.296-0700"
     version="1.0.0">
   <mainDescription>&lt;p>&#xD;
-    The items in this checklist represent good practices for creating a high-quality implementation. Try to address every&#xD;
-    item to the greatest extent possible to create the best implementation. It may not be possible to address every item,&#xD;
-    and you may be able to address some items to only a limited extent. In these cases, be sure that there are good reasons&#xD;
-    for only partially addressing an item or not addressing an item at all.&#xD;
-&lt;/p>&#xD;
-&lt;p>&#xD;
     This checklist is not something that should be considered only for heavyweight code reviews. Each developer should keep&#xD;
     the quality criteria embodied in these check items in mind while coding. When developers work together, the review&#xD;
     against these criteria should be done in real time so that quality is ensured up front as they are writing the code.&#xD;