note from 10/28 meeting
diff --git a/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt b/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..815b84c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+20041028 Agenda
+
+ Jim/Arthur to report on Server API meeting in Toronto
+ (since Tim out)
+ Naci/Chuck to report/present flexible project layout
+
+
+ Jim:
+
+ good meeting, appreciates complexity of the domain
+ (much of the complexity hard to capture in use cases).
+
+ overall, not a lot of simplification possible.
+
+ * with the one exception of factoring out "project"
+ related things, and probably replacing with a
+ "module factory", where the project layout specific
+ code could go. (the project specific stuff is mostly
+ relevant during "publish" aspects and "project has changed"
+ aspects).
+
+ Once projects "removed" ... the "server core" and "module core"
+ should be fairly separate pieces.
+
+ This Needs a "concept document" describing domain.
+ * [task] Jim will produce a draft of the document, while
+ ideas are fresh in his mind.
+
+ * Remaining (continuing) issue: They did not work on separation
+ of WST part and JST part.
+
+ Naci (and Chuck):
+
+ Naci presented the use-case/design document he has in development directory,
+ projectlayout-nmd.ppt.
+
+ Chuck will put his response to this document in development directory
+ as well. (The gist of which is a certain role out of what's feasible
+ when, and some mention of successes in prototyping complex layouts using
+ linked folders/resources. (I got the impression that for main flexible
+ projects, there may be no need for improved Eclipse base support, but
+ need to confirm that with Chuch/Naci as this work progresses.
+
+ It was agreed a "concepts" document is needed here too, but
+ was decided to wait until we see Jim's draft of server part,
+ to decide how best to proceed.
+
+
+ Agenda for next week:
+
+ Jim will discuss/present servers/modules concepts document.
+
\ No newline at end of file
