| Agenda/Notes for 4/7 meeting |
| |
| Invitees: David, Kevin, Naci, Ted, Chuck |
| Special Guests: Chris Brealey, Craig Salter, Michael Elder |
| |
| Attendees |
| Invitees: David, Ted, Chuck |
| Special Guests: Chris Brealey, Craig Salter, Michael Elder |
| |
| |
| Discussed these architecture topics |
| |
| 88017 cbrealey@ca.ibm.com david_williams@us.ibm.com [arch] Should Internet proxy settings move to base? |
| |
| Action: Chris will move to Eclipse 3.2 enhancement request |
| Chris has moved 88017 to 3.2 base feature request. |
| |
| Action: Craig brought up internet caching in general is platform issue. |
| Chris or Craig will open feature request for Eclipse 3.2 |
| |
| 88014 csalter@ca.ibm.com david_williams@us.ibm.com [arch] Should URI Resolver be WTP API |
| |
| Craig proposes to make internal.provisional for 1.0 |
| need to clarify (document) use cases handled, use cases not, use cases desired |
| |
| 88015 csalter@ca.ibm.com david_williams@us.ibm.com [arch] Is XML Catalog ready for API? |
| |
| plan is to eventually support a subset of OASIS spec |
| such as, save our catalog in OASIS format |
| Craig will document our degree of (or lack of) compliance |
| still planning to have catlog extension point ... but still some |
| issues to settle on for proposed API. |
| need good tutorial/links on 3rd party DTDs/Schemas |
| Craig has submited some DTDs and Schemas for re-distribution |
| |
| |
| 88012 mdelder@us.ibm.com david_williams@us.ibm.com [arch] Should extensible navigator be API? (and brief status of "flexible project" API) |
| |
| Long discussion on current status and plans. |
| General concern about the try{}finally{} required pattern and some |
| possible improvements |
| Need to revisit with Kevin issue of if the resource-level "flexible project" |
| API should be in base Eclipse. (Might effect if marked 'provisional' in WTP 1.0, |
| or at least need to make sure we have migration path open to all). |
| |
| |
| |
| Also, |
| |
| Should WTP do any work on "jarred plugins" or manifest-only plugins? |
| <not discussed, but component leads generally feel like "maybe", but not |
| P1 item> |
| |
| Update or questions from Ted and Chuck on Architecture Overview document |
| <offline, Chuck reported no pretty pictures yet ... but should be soon, |
| haven't talked to Ted about status yet.> |
| |
