added aspectj reference and a few more links
diff --git a/whatsnew211/index.html b/whatsnew211/index.html
index 4d4c3f3..3c43bfd 100644
--- a/whatsnew211/index.html
+++ b/whatsnew211/index.html
@@ -1,176 +1,224 @@
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
-<html><head>
-<link rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.eclipse.org/default_style.css" charset="ISO-8859-1" type="text/css">
-<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="content-type"><title>AJDT 2.1.1 - New and Noteworthy</title>
+<html>
+<head>
+<link rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.eclipse.org/default_style.css"
+ charset="ISO-8859-1" type="text/css">
+<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="content-type">
+<title>AJDT 2.1.1 - New and Noteworthy</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>AJDT 2.1.1 - New and Noteworthy</h1>
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" width="80%">
-<tbody>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Overview</b></td>
-<td valign="top">In this release, we have focussed on searching and refactoring support
-for Intertype Declarations (ITDs) and Declare declarations. This will particularly benefit users
-of <a href="http://www.springsource.org/roo">Spring Roo</a> who will be better able to search
-and refactor source code that contains Roo-style aspects.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tbody>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Overview</b></td>
+ <td valign="top">In this release, we have focussed on searching
+ and refactoring support for Intertype Declarations (ITDs) and Declare
+ declarations. This will particularly benefit users of <a
+ href="http://www.springsource.org/roo">Spring Roo</a> who will be
+ better able to search and refactor source code that contains
+ Roo-style aspects.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td colspan="2">
-<hr></td></tr>
-<tr>
-<td colspan="2" valign="top" align="center"><h3>Searching</h3></td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">
+ <h3>Searching</h3>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Searching for ITD target types</b></td>
-<td>
-Target types of intertype declarations now appear in the search results when searching for type references:
-<br/>
-<br/>
-<img/>
-<br/>
-<br/>
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Searching for ITD target types</b></td>
+ <td>Target types of intertype declarations now appear in the
+ search results when searching for type references: <br />
+ <br />
+ <img /> <br />
+ <br />
+ </td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Searching for Declare parents</b></td>
-<td>
-Types referenced inside of declare parents declarations are also returned in search results where appropriate:
-<br/>
-<br/>
-<img/>
-<br/>
-<br/>
-This even works for referenced annotations:
-<br/>
-<br/>
-<img/>
-<br/>
-<br/>
-There are some caveates, however. Wild cards are not supported. Also, type bindings are sometimes not respected, meaning that
-two types with the same name, but different packages may be inappropriately matched.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Searching for Declare parents</b></td>
+ <td>Types referenced inside of declare parents declarations are
+ also returned in search results where appropriate: <br />
+ <br />
+ <img /> <br />
+ <br />
+ This even works for referenced annotations: <br />
+ <br />
+ <img /> <br />
+ <br />
+ There are some caveates, however. Wild cards are not supported. Also,
+ type bindings are sometimes not respected, meaning that two types
+ with the same name, but different packages may be inappropriately
+ matched.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Searching for Declare annotation</b></td>
-<td>
-And finally, types, methods, and fields referenced inside of declare annotation declarations are similarly found when searching
-for references:
-<br/>
-<br/>
-<img/>
-
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Searching for Declare annotation</b></td>
+ <td>And finally, types, methods, and fields referenced inside of
+ declare annotation declarations are similarly found when searching
+ for references: <br />
+ <br />
+ <img /></td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td colspan="2">
-<hr></td></tr>
-<tr>
-<td colspan="2" valign="top" align="center"><h3>Refactoring</h3></td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2" valign="top" align="center">
+ <h3>Refactoring</h3>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Rename refactoring</b></td>
-<td>
-Rename refactoring is working in almost all situations. Intertype declarations can be renamed; fields, methods, and types referenced
-inside of Aspects will be appropriately renamed; and AJ Compilation units will be renamed when appropriate. Most of this work
-was completed for the <a href="../whatsnew210/index.html">2.1.0 release</a>, with some small fixes included in this release. The most significant
-improvement in this area is that package renames are properly reflected in the import statements and fully qualified names of
-AJ compilation units.
-<br/>
-<br/>
-<img/>
-<br/>
-<br/>
-AJDT does not currently support the renaming of named pointcuts.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Rename refactoring</b></td>
+ <td>Rename refactoring is working in almost all situations.
+ Intertype declarations can be renamed; fields, methods, and types
+ referenced inside of Aspects will be appropriately renamed; and AJ
+ Compilation units will be renamed when appropriate. Most of this work
+ was completed for the <a href="../whatsnew210/index.html">2.1.0
+ release</a>, with some small fixes included in this release. The most
+ significant improvement in this area is that package renames are
+ properly reflected in the import statements and fully qualified names
+ of AJ compilation units. <br />
+ <br />
+ <img /> <br />
+ <br />
+ AJDT does not currently support the renaming of named pointcuts.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Move refactoring</b></td>
-<td>
-Similarly, move refactoring is AspectJ-aware. Import statements and fully qualified names will be properly updated in Aspects when types and compilation units move.
-It is also possible to drag and drop types, fields, and methods into aspects, with the same behavior as you would expect when the project is pure Java.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Move refactoring</b></td>
+ <td>Similarly, move refactoring is AspectJ-aware. Import
+ statements and fully qualified names will be properly updated in
+ Aspects when types and compilation units move. It is also possible to
+ drag and drop types, fields, and methods into aspects, with the same
+ behavior as you would expect when the project is pure Java.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Pull-out refactoring enhancements</b></td>
-<td>
-It is now possible to choose a non-existant aspect as the target of a Pull-out refactoring. This aspect will be created as
-part of the refactoring operation.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Pull-out refactoring enhancements</b></td>
+ <td>It is now possible to choose a non-existant aspect as the
+ target of a Pull-out refactoring. This aspect will be created as part
+ of the refactoring operation.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Catalog of working refactorings in AJ files</b></td>
-<td>
-In this release, we have done significant work in making sure that the standard JDT refactorings are available
-when inside an Aspect. We have focussed on the more widely used refactorings, and left some of the less
-popular refactorings unimplemented.
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Catalog of working refactorings in AJ
+ files</b></td>
+ <td>In this release, we have done significant work in making
+ sure that the standard JDT refactorings are available when inside an
+ Aspect. We have focussed on the more widely used refactorings, and
+ left some of the less popular refactorings unimplemented. In addition
+ to the AspectJ-specific <strong>Push in</strong> abd <strong>Pull
+ out</strong> refactorings, and the standard <strong>Rename</strong> and <strong>Move</strong>here
+ are the JDT refactorings that are currently known to work in AJDT:
-In addition to the AspectJ-specific <strong>Push in</strong> abd <strong>Pull out</strong> refactorings, and the
-standard <strong>Rename</strong> and <strong>Move</strong>here are the JDT
-refactorings that are currently known to work in AJDT:
+ <ul>
+ <li>Push Down</li>
+ <li>Extract Class</li>
+ <li>Pull up</li>
+ <li>Push down</li>
+ <li>Use super type where possible</li>
+ <li>Inline</li>
+ <li>Extract Method</li>
+ <li>Extract Local Variable</li>
+ <li>Extract Constant</li>
+ <li>Introduce indirection</li>
+ <li>Introduce parameter (non-advice)</li>
+ </ul>
-<ul>
-<li>Push Down</li>
-<li>Extract Class</li>
-<li>Pull up</li>
-<li>Push down</li>
-<li>Use super type where possible</li>
-<li>Inline</li>
-<li>Extract Method</li>
-<li>Extract Local Variable</li>
-<li>Extract Constant</li>
-<li>Introduce indirection</li>
-<li>Introduce parameter (non-advice)</li>
-</ul>
+ The following refactorings will produce correct results, even though
+ the refactoring wizard complains about compilation errors:
+ <ul>
+ <li>Change method signature</li>
+ <li>Introduce Parameter Object (inside non-ITD method)</li>
+ </ul>
-The following refactorings will produce correct results, even though the refactoring wizard complains about compilation errors:
-<ul>
-<li>Change method signature</li>
-<li>Introduce Parameter Object (inside non-ITD method)</li>
-</ul>
+ And finally, the following refactorings produce errors and do not
+ work inside aspects:
-And finally, the following refactorings produce errors and do not work inside aspects:
+ <ul>
+ <li>Extract super class</li>
+ <li>Infer generic arguments where possible</li>
+ <li>Introduce Parameter (inside advice)</li>
+ <li>Introduce Parameter Object</li>
+ <li>Convert Local variable to a field</li>
+ <li>Encapsulate field</li>
+ </ul>
-<ul>
-<li>Extract super class</li>
-<li>Infer generic arguments where possible</li>
-<li>Introduce Parameter (inside advice)</li>
-<li>Introduce Parameter Object</li>
-<li>Convert Local variable to a field</li>
-<li>Encapsulate field</li>
-</ul>
+ If you want us to fix any of the above refactorings, or you notice a
+ problem with one of the existing refactorings, please notify us on
+ the mailing list or raise a bugzilla request for it.</td>
+ </tr>
-If you want us to fix any of the above refactorings, or you notice a problem with one of the existing refactorings, please notify us
-on the mailing list or raise a bugzilla request for it.
-</td>
-</tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>AspectJ 1.6.10</b></td>
+ <td>AJDT 2.1.0 includes AspectJ 1.6.10. See the <a
+ href="http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-1610.html">readme</a>
+ for details.</td>
+ </tr>
-<tr>
-<td colspan="2">
-<hr></td></tr>
-<tr>
-<td valign="top"><b>Previous Releases</b></td>
-<td>
-See <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt/whatsnew210/index.html">here</a>
-for information on the new features in AJDT 2.1.0.
-</td>
-</tr>
-</tbody>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Bug Fixes</b></td>
+ <td>See <a href="http://tinyurl.com/297kbp7">bugzilla</a> for a
+ list of bugs addressed in this release.</td>
+ </tr>
+
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Previous Releases</b></td>
+ <td>See <a
+ href="http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt/whatsnew210/index.html">here</a>
+ for information on the new features in AJDT 2.1.0.</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td colspan="2">
+ <hr>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td valign="top"><b>Thanks!</b></td>
+ <td>Thanks for community help and feedback during this release
+ cycle. You can contact the AJDT team on the <a
+ href="https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev">mailing
+ list</a>, and raise bugs on <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/">bugzilla</a>.
+ We also lurk on the <a
+ href="http://eclipse.org/aspectj/userlists.php">AspectJ users
+ list</a>, and on the <a
+ href="http://forum.springsource.org/forumdisplay.php?f=32">SpringSource
+ Tool Suite forum</a>.</td>
+ </tr>
+ </tbody>
</table>
-</body></html>
+</body>
+</html>
