diff --git a/minutes/2006.02.06.html b/minutes/2006.02.06.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15542af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/minutes/2006.02.06.html
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+
+<h1>PMC Minutes February 6, 2006</h1>
+<div align="center">
+  <center>
+  <table border="0" cellspacing="3">
+    <tr>
+      <td align="center" bgcolor="#CCCCCC"><b>Attending</b></td>
+      <td align="center" >&nbsp;</td>
+      <td align="center" bgcolor="#CCCCCC"><b>Regrets</b></td>
+      <td align="center" >&nbsp;</td>
+      <td align="center" bgcolor="#CCCCCC"><b>Missing</b></td>
+    </tr>
+    <tr>
+      <td>Bjorn Freeman-Benson</td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td>Wayne Beaton</td>
+    </tr>
+    <tr>
+      <td>Cliff Schmidt</td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td>Ward Cunningham</td>
+    </tr>
+    <tr>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td></td>
+      <td>John Duimovich</td>
+    </tr>
+  </table>
+  </center>
+</div>
+<p>We accepted the resignation of Brian Barry from the PMC. Brian was one of the
+founders of the Technology Project&nbsp; and a key reason for its success. He
+believes the Project is in good hands with the newly expanded PMC and thus moves
+on to focus his energies elsewhere. We are disappointed to see him go, and thank
+him for helping to bring the Technology Project to the vibrant success that it
+is today.</p>
+
+<p>Cliff noted that the PMC minutes are near impossible to find via the website,
+so Bjorn linked them from the PMC page as well.</p>
+
+<p>We reviewed our review of the <a href="/vtp/">Voice Tools Project</a>. We
+discovered that VTP is an active project (a low-level of activity, but active)
+and thus encouraged the team to do more of their work in public (on the mailing
+lists, newsgroups, bugzilla, etc). The team accepted this advice and has already
+begun to work more in public.</p>
+
+<p>This week we reviewed the <a href="/laszlo/">IDE for Laszlo</a> project. As
+with all project reviews, we started by looking at the public evidence of the
+project: mailing lists, newsgroups, bugzilla, website, project plan, CVS
+repository, etc. We noticed that there is no discussion on the dev mailing list;
+the website does not list team members nor project leaders nor milestones nor a
+project plan; there are only two bugs in the bugzilla, neither of which has been
+responded to by the development team; most of the CVS files were committed three
+months ago and have not been touched since; there are no integration or
+milestone builds and the build number is not Eclipse standard. There is a little
+conversation on the newsgroup, but it is mostly people saying &quot;it doesn't
+work&quot; and then someone replying that specific versions X and Y of various
+plug-ins are needed. Our fear is that this project is a <i>code dump</i> - a
+project that was formed around an initial contribution of completed code and
+then abandoned by the developers. We sent the project lead (MOREMORE) an email
+asking for an explanation and/or more details.</p>
+
+<p>Next week we will review the <a href="/ptp/">Parallel Tools Project</a>.</p>