note from 10/28 meeting
diff --git a/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt b/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..815b84c --- /dev/null +++ b/development/meetingnotes/20041028.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +20041028 Agenda + + Jim/Arthur to report on Server API meeting in Toronto + (since Tim out) + Naci/Chuck to report/present flexible project layout + + + Jim: + + good meeting, appreciates complexity of the domain + (much of the complexity hard to capture in use cases). + + overall, not a lot of simplification possible. + + * with the one exception of factoring out "project" + related things, and probably replacing with a + "module factory", where the project layout specific + code could go. (the project specific stuff is mostly + relevant during "publish" aspects and "project has changed" + aspects). + + Once projects "removed" ... the "server core" and "module core" + should be fairly separate pieces. + + This Needs a "concept document" describing domain. + * [task] Jim will produce a draft of the document, while + ideas are fresh in his mind. + + * Remaining (continuing) issue: They did not work on separation + of WST part and JST part. + + Naci (and Chuck): + + Naci presented the use-case/design document he has in development directory, + projectlayout-nmd.ppt. + + Chuck will put his response to this document in development directory + as well. (The gist of which is a certain role out of what's feasible + when, and some mention of successes in prototyping complex layouts using + linked folders/resources. (I got the impression that for main flexible + projects, there may be no need for improved Eclipse base support, but + need to confirm that with Chuch/Naci as this work progresses. + + It was agreed a "concepts" document is needed here too, but + was decided to wait until we see Jim's draft of server part, + to decide how best to proceed. + + + Agenda for next week: + + Jim will discuss/present servers/modules concepts document. + \ No newline at end of file