blob: 259c59834586f50d3d096f72339b29959dcda3f4 [file] [log] [blame]
<html>
<head>
<title>WTP PMC Minutes for November 29, 2005 Conference Call</title>
</head>
<body alink="#ff0000" bgcolor="#ffffff" link="#0000ee" text="#000000" vlink="#551a8b">
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" width="100%">
<tbody><tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left" bgcolor="#0080c0" valign="top"><b>
<font color="#ffffff" face="Arial,Helvetica">PMC Conference Call - November 29, 2005</font></b></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" width="100%">
<tbody><tr>
<td>
Attending:
Tim Wagner [TW],
Jochen Krause [JK],
Arthur Ryman [AR]
David Williams [DW],
Lawrence Mandel [LM],
Raghunathan Srinivasan [RS],
Christophe Ney [CN]
<!--PMC MEMBERS NOT PRESENT ON THIS CALL:
Naci Dai [ND],
-->
<h1>WTP PMC Minutes for November 29, 2005 Conference Call</h1>
<h2>Community Update [LM] </h2>
<ul>
<li>1.0 rollout
<ul>
<li>Tutorials need to be updated / corrected for 1.0
<li>Blogging by WTP members
<li>Blogging by 3rd parties (will need to inform/remind)
<li>Press release (driven by EMO)
<li>Documentation placed online and searchable by Google
<li>Explore links from main and download page
<li>Arthur created a "FreshMeat" entry for M9 to garner additional awareness of our
tools (in review stage)
<li>Should also plan for Slashdot article
<li>EclipseZone interview
</ul>
<li>Project Phoenix feedback solicited; anyone who has spare cycles, please feel free to comment
on the content, presentation, and toolset.
</ul>
<h2>Emerging API Migration/Support Policy </h2>
<ul>
<li>Summary by Arthur of non-API support policy proposal (see agenda); goal is to provide best
level of support to adopters that we can. Focus is primarily on 1.0 - 1.5 transition, although
even post 1.5 there will be ongoing API evolution issues for adopters to worry about.
<li>Result depends in large part on community engagement; usage reports will be helpful in driving
WTP activities.
<li>Need to ensure that we don't turn this into a mechanism for exposing any arbitrary internal
methods into lifetime commitments.
</ul>
<h2>1.0 Status </h2>
<ul>
<li>Large backlog of bugs, documentation, and JUnit testing going on
<li>Initial RC will take place this week as planned, although there will still be some areas with
insufficient tests
<li>Will solicit P2 review from devs via mailing list (as well as remind people of endgame plan)
</ul>
<h2>Requirements Update </h2>
<ul>
<li>No wiki input yet.
<li>Planning requirements discussion planned for 12/15 status call.
</ul>
<h2>Calisto Update </h2>
<ul>
<li>David reviewed bugs; doesn't look bad, but we cannot commit to making the M4 train due to
conflict with 1.0.
</ul>
<h2>JSF Update </h2>
<ul>
<li>Milestone 1 demo planned for next week.
<li>Build issues getting resolved; progress on feature definition.
<li>Bugzilla organization fixed.
</ul>
<h2>Action Items</h2>
<ul>
<li>[TW] send out clarified end game
<li>[AR] send note to devs regarding P2 status (for RC1 production)
</ul>
<small>Minutes taken by Tim Wagner, November 29, 2005</small>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</html>