blob: 0b2e84cac167b55cccc0187e6097769c5dc79498 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription xmi:version="2.0"
xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.5/uma.ecore"
xmlns:rmc="http://www.ibm.com/rmc" rmc:version="7.5.0" xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf"
epf:version="1.5.0" xmi:id="_NqYIcqeqEdmKDbQuyzCoqQ"
name="test_script,_0ZfMEMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw" guid="_NqYIcqeqEdmKDbQuyzCoqQ" changeDate="2008-08-14T11:54:15.383-0400"
version="7.2.0">
<purpose>&lt;p>&#xD;
To provide the implementation of a subset of required tests in an efficient and effective manner.&#xD;
&lt;/p></purpose>
<impactOfNotHaving>Without a this artifact it will be difficult to ensure that tests are being carried out in a consistent manner so that&#xD;
results are repeatable and any errors discovered can be recreated.&amp;nbsp; It also makes it more difficult to validate that&#xD;
errors were not caused because of the way in which tests were executed.</impactOfNotHaving>
<reasonsForNotNeeding>&lt;p>&#xD;
This artifact may not be required if&amp;nbsp;the tests are very simple in nature or testing is only being done on an&#xD;
informal basis.&amp;nbsp; However, in order for this approach to be successful, testers need to be disciplined in tracking&#xD;
their processes, as they may have to recreate a problem scenario.&amp;nbsp; Alternatively, automatic capture/playback tools&#xD;
could be put in place to provide a record of such testing.&#xD;
&lt;/p></reasonsForNotNeeding>
</org.eclipse.epf.uma:ArtifactDescription>