| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
| <org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription xmi:version="2.0" |
| xmlns:xmi="http://www.omg.org/XMI" xmlns:org.eclipse.epf.uma="http://www.eclipse.org/epf/uma/1.0.4/uma.ecore" |
| xmlns:epf="http://www.eclipse.org/epf" |
| epf:version="1.2.0" xmi:id="_4LuPMMPcEdmbOvqy4O0adg" |
| name="test_script,_0Z9tMMlgEdmt3adZL5Dmdw" guid="_4LuPMMPcEdmbOvqy4O0adg" changeDate="2005-07-26T13:21:21.082-0700" |
| version="1.0.0"> |
| <sections xmi:id="_13iTQBOkEdyl0eKFlAahCA" name="Does the test script have a unique name that identifies the condition that the 
script evaluates?" |
| guid="_13iTQBOkEdyl0eKFlAahCA"> |
| <sectionDescription><p> Does the name clearly indicate the condition evaluated or the expected result? 
 |
| For example, "ABC99" might be unique, but it is not clear what condition it 
 |
| evaluates. In contrast, "UI99 Unauthenticated users are prompted for login" 
 |
| or "BR27 Alphanumeric characters are not permitted in US zip codes"&nbsp;indicate 
 |
| both the test conditions and the expected results. </p></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_DiPTsE_cEduqM_QlWBlZ_g" name="Does the test script conform to the related test case?" |
| guid="_DiPTsE_cEduqM_QlWBlZ_g"> |
| <sectionDescription><p> Does the test script identify the test case or cases that it implements? Ensure 
 |
| that the test script conforms to the specification established in the test case.&nbsp;The 
 |
| test case captures the logical conditions of satisfaction for test, and the 
 |
| test script must implement this intent. </p></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_5_92wE_cEduqM_QlWBlZ_g" name="Is the test script prescriptive and unambiguous?" |
| guid="_5_92wE_cEduqM_QlWBlZ_g"> |
| <sectionDescription><ul>
 |
| <li> Does the test script have clear&nbsp;pass or fail criteria?&nbsp;(Is it 
 |
| binary?)&nbsp; </li>
 |
| <li> Does the script use a request-response style in its steps? (Is it procedural?) 
 |
| </li>
 |
| <li> Does each specific input have a specific expected result? (Is it declarative?) 
 |
| </li>
 |
| </ul></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_hU9AABOkEdyl0eKFlAahCA" name="Is all required data specified?" |
| guid="_hU9AABOkEdyl0eKFlAahCA"> |
| <sectionDescription><p> Ensure that the test script contains or references all of the test data required 
 |
| to actually run the script. </p></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| <sections xmi:id="_wFJzABOmEdyl0eKFlAahCA" name="Is each post-condition of the related test case evaluated by a step in the test script?" |
| guid="_wFJzABOmEdyl0eKFlAahCA"/> |
| <sections xmi:id="_Ko30MBOlEdyl0eKFlAahCA" name="Does the test script set up and tear down appropriately?" |
| guid="_Ko30MBOlEdyl0eKFlAahCA"> |
| <sectionDescription><ul>
 |
| <li> Does the test script identify the preconditions that must be true before 
 |
| the test script starts? </li>
 |
| <li> Does the test script restore the system's state after it runs, regardless 
 |
| of whether it passes or fails? </li>
 |
| <li> Can the test script be executed without affecting the results of other 
 |
| test scripts? In other words, can the test script be run in any sequence?&nbsp;If 
 |
| not, is the sequence dependency identified? The dependency might be identified 
 |
| in the test script, in a test suite, or in some other manner (such as by using 
 |
| a test tool). </li>
 |
| </ul></sectionDescription> |
| </sections> |
| </org.eclipse.epf.uma:ContentDescription> |
