update plan
diff --git a/aspectjplan.xml b/aspectjplan.xml
index cae5d5b..2347f8e 100644
--- a/aspectjplan.xml
+++ b/aspectjplan.xml
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
name="AspectJ">
<release projectid="tools.aspectj" version="1.0"/>
<introduction>
- <html:div>AspectJ major versions match up with Java versions. Currently Java is at 1.8 and AspectJ is
- about to release the 1.8 version. The AspectJ project then releases
+ <html:div>AspectJ major versions match up with Java versions. Currently Java is at 9 (1.9) and AspectJ is
+ about to release the 1.9 version. The AspectJ project then releases
service refreshes to that major version every
few months. The current release model is at least something every 3 months - sometimes a milestone,
sometimes a full release.</html:div>
<html:div>AspectJ always maintains that HEAD will build clean and pass all the tests we have (currently
- around 4600). This means the development builds created from HEAD after every commit are always at least
+ around 4700). This means the development builds created from HEAD after every commit are always at least
as good as the previous build.</html:div>
</introduction>
<release_deliverables>
@@ -22,18 +22,19 @@
<preamble>h
<html:div></html:div>
</preamble>
- <milestone date="07/13/2013" milestone="1.8.0M1"><html:div>AspectJ 1.8.0 milestone 1</html:div></milestone>
- <milestone date="10/25/2013" milestone="1.7.4"><html:div>AspectJ 1.7.4 (service refresh on 1.7 line)</html:div></milestone>
+ <milestone date="11/15/2017" milestone="1.9.0.RC3"><html:div>AspectJ 1.9.0 release candidate 1</html:div></milestone>
+ <milestone date="11/15/2017" milestone="1.8.13"><html:div>AspectJ 1.8.13 release</html:div></milestone>
+ <milestone date="11/09/2017" milestone="1.9.0.RC2"><html:div>AspectJ 1.9.0 release candidate 1</html:div></milestone>
+ <milestone date="10/21/2017" milestone="1.9.0.RC1"><html:div>AspectJ 1.9.0 release candidate 1</html:div></milestone>
+ <milestone date="10/20/2017" milestone="1.8.12"><html:div>AspectJ 1.8.12 release</html:div></milestone>
<postamble><html:div> </html:div></postamble>
</release_milestones>
<target_environments>
- <html:div>During AspectJ 1.6.6 development the decision was made to exploit generics internally and
- this has improved the quality of the codebase. However, this means the 1.6.6 weaver (and therefore compiler) now require
- a Java 1.5 runtime. Previous versions of AspectJ required only Java 1.4</html:div>
- <html:div>The woven code produced by AspectJ will run on any VM from Java 1.3 onwards.</html:div>
- <html:div>The compiler/weaver will run on 1.5 but with AspectJ 1.8 these have the ability to compile 1.8 source code
- (using 1.8 features like lambda) or weave into 1.8 bytecode that is exploiting recent bytecode
- enhancements like invokedynamic.</html:div>
+ <html:div>During AspectJ 1.8 we moved to a baseline requirement of Java8. AspectJ 1.9 will run on Java8 or Java9.
+ If using purely the pointcut matching parts of AspectJ (like Spring AOP does) it is possible to use that
+ part of AspectJ 1.8 running on Java 9, but for proper operation of all AspectJ features, if using Java 9
+ then users should be using AspectJ 1.9.
+ </html:div>
<internationalization>
<html:div>We have bundles for many of the messages in the project but they are not translated.</html:div>
</internationalization>
@@ -46,13 +47,18 @@
<preamble>
<html:div>These are the larger themes and priorities right now:</html:div>
</preamble>
- <theme name="Memory Usage">
- <description><html:div>Improving it across all parts of AspectJ: compilation, weaving and load-time weaving.</html:div></description>
+ <theme name="Maintenance and JDK chasing">
+ <description><html:div>AspectJ is effectly in a maintenance mode right node, this means periodic
+ bug fix releases and updates to consume the latest fixes from JDT. With the increase in
+ velocity of JDK releases, we need to think about the best way to handle that in AspectJ.</html:div></description>
+ <!--
<committed bugzilla="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&target_milestone=1.8.0&short_desc=%5Bplan%5D+%5Bmemory%5D&product=AspectJ&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">
<html:div>Planned [memory] changes</html:div></committed>
<proposed bugzilla="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&target_milestone=1.8.0&short_desc=%5Bplan%5D+%5Bmemory%5D&product=AspectJ&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">
<html:div>Planned [memory] changes</html:div></proposed>
+-->
</theme>
+ <!--
<theme name="Full set of work items for next release">
<description><html:div>The fixes and enhancements that are in 1.8.0 development builds and those still scheduled to be completed before final release.</html:div></description>
<proposed bugzilla="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=%5Bplan%5D&product=AspectJ&target_milestone=1.8.0&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&bug_severity=trivial&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">
@@ -70,7 +76,7 @@
<committed bugzilla="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&product=AspectJ&target_milestone=1.8.0&target_milestone=1.8.0.M1&target_milestone=1.7.4&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&bug_severity=trivial&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">
<html:div>Fixed</html:div></committed>
</theme>
-
+-->
</themes_and_priorities>
<!-- appendix name="Project Refactoring">
