| <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> | 
 |  | 
 | <html> | 
 |  | 
 | <head> | 
 | <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> | 
 | <meta name="Author" content="Eclipse WTP PMC"> | 
 | <title>Eclipse Web Tools Project Plan Plan</title> | 
 | <link rel="stylesheet" href="default_style.css" type="text/css"> | 
 |  | 
 | </head> | 
 |  | 
 | <body> | 
 |  | 
 | <h1>Eclipse Web Tools | 
 |  Project Plan Summary</h1> | 
 | <p>Last revised February 16, 2005</p> | 
 | <h2>Executive Summary of Current Plan</h2> | 
 | <p>The Web Tools Platform top-level project is currently working on the 1.0  | 
 | release. The Web Tools Platform is currently in process of its first major  | 
 | release and thus is concentrating on completing, formalizing, and stabilizing  | 
 | the initial frameworks and APIs. The project is not planning major new  | 
 | functionality at this time. The framework and exemplary tools include server  | 
 | tools, web tools, XML tools, structure source editing, EJB tools, web service  | 
 | tools, data tools, and vendor neutral flexible project layouts.</p> | 
 | <p>The Web Tools Platform project is tracking the Eclipse Platform closely and  | 
 | is taking advantage of the latest Platform innovations to provide user interface  | 
 | consistency and seamless integration. The Web Tools milestone releases are  | 
 | hosted on the very latest Platform milestone release at all times. The R1.0  | 
 | final release is planned for late July 2005 on top of the Platform 3.1 final  | 
 | release.</p> | 
 | <p>Details on the current plan(s) can be found at:</p> | 
 | <ul> | 
 |   <li> WTP 1.0 release | 
 |   <a href="http://eclipse.org/webtools/development/planning/roadmap.html"> | 
 |   roadmap</a>, | 
 |   <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/eclipse_WTP_project_plan_1_0.html"> | 
 |   project plan</a>, general milestone | 
 |   <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/planning/milestone_plan_1_0.html"> | 
 |   plan</a>, and | 
 |   <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/milestone_plans/reports/report-milestone-overview.html"> | 
 |   detailed milestone plan</a></li> | 
 | </ul> | 
 | <h2>Forward Looking Statement</h2> | 
 | <p>The <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/themes.html">Eclipse Themes  | 
 | and Priorities</a> are one of the guiding focus areas for the features and  | 
 | enhancements in Web Tools Platform Project. Overall, Web Tools is an  | 
 | initial-phase project and thus our focus is on a stable, robust, functional API  | 
 | that add-in providers can build upon, rather than on adding new features.  | 
 | Because of this focus, we are more driven by our Architecture Plan and less by  | 
 | the community feedback of new features (through Bugzilla).</p> | 
 | <ul> | 
 |   <li><b>Scaling Up</b> - During release 1.0, we are not planning any work on  | 
 |   handling very large websites. The project anticipates working on those issues  | 
 |   during release 2.0 while utilizing the features of the Platform releases 3.1  | 
 |   and 3.2.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Enterprise Ready</b> - We do not have any plans for supporting specific  | 
 |   enterprise development features. The Web Tools Platform project already  | 
 |   supports a set of vendor neutral APIs for connecting to web servers and  | 
 |   databases to enable development across a wide variety of enterprise  | 
 |   configurations.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Design for Extensibility: Be a Better Platform</b> - During release  | 
 |   1.0, we are not planning any work on being a platform for other projects. We  | 
 |   anticipate working with the Test & Performance Tooling Platform as well as the  | 
 |   Business Intelligence and Reporting Project in the release 1.1 and release 2.0  | 
 |   time frame to support their requirements in our tools.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Embedded Development </b>- We do not have any specific plans for  | 
 |   supporting embedded development.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Rich Client Platform</b> - We do not have any specific plans for  | 
 |   supporting the Rich Client Platform.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Simple to Use</b> - During release 1.0, the project is concentrating on  | 
 |   creating a very solid base of well designed and excellently implemented APIs.  | 
 |   Thus we are not allocating any release 1.0 effort to improving the user  | 
 |   interface. However, the project intends to allocate significant resources to  | 
 |   the user interface and user experience during releases 1.1 and 2.0. For  | 
 |   example, the project plans to provide Darwin Information Typing Architecture  | 
 |   based XML help.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Enable Consistent Multi-language Support</b> - The WTP project will  | 
 |   support Java-JSP dual-language development, but we do not have plans to  | 
 |   support or enabling any other multi-language development.</li> | 
 |   <li><b>Appealing to Broader Community</b> - In the WTP 1.1 and 2.0 releases,  | 
 |   we will continue to track the appropriate Web and J2EE standards. These  | 
 |   standards are undergoing rapid evolution, especially in the area of XML and  | 
 |   Web services. Each release of WTP will both upgrade support for existing key  | 
 |   standards and introduce new support for industrially relevant emerging  | 
 |   standards.<ul> | 
 |     <li>The WTP project will exploit J2SE Java 5.</li> | 
 |     <li>The WTP project will support SOAP 1.2, WSDL 2.0, and their reference  | 
 |     implementations.</li> | 
 |     <li>The WTP project will support JSRs 175 and 181.</li> | 
 |     <li>The WTP project will support J2EE 1.5.</li> | 
 |     <li><i>What other standards?</i></li> | 
 |   </ul> | 
 |   </li> | 
 | </ul> | 
 | <p><i>Are there any known unresolved issues? Are we not testing on enough  | 
 | platforms? Under resourced in certain areas?</i></p> | 
 | <p><i>It would be good to have "candidate work areas" in each of these themes,  | 
 | or at least in the themes that are relevant to WTP.</i></p> | 
 | <p><i>This forward looking statement is somewhat minimal and it would be nice if  | 
 | someone could make some strengthening comments.</i></p> | 
 | </body> | 
 |  | 
 | </html> |