[46376] pkgname (case-insens) = a classname results in 
too complicated to parse init string
diff --git a/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/InitParserTest46376.java b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/InitParserTest46376.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f208c3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/InitParserTest46376.java
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c)  2003 IBM Corporation and others.
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials 
+ * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
+ * 
+ * Contributors:
+ *     IBM Corporation - initial API and implementation
+ *******************************************************************************/
+/*
+ *  $RCSfile: InitParserTest46376.java,v $
+ *  $Revision: 1.1 $  $Date: 2003/11/11 16:27:40 $ 
+ */
+ 
+/**
+ * This is to test for defect [46376].
+ * 
+ * SameName test. This is test where you have this:
+ * 	initParserTest46376.SameNameTestClass.java
+ * 	InitParserTest46376.java
+ *  
+ * Before [46376] the Static parser would find throw NoClassDefFoundError on initParserTest46376 when looking for
+ * SameNameTestClass and never find the class.
+ * 
+ * To compile in Eclipse we need to have one of the classes be in the default package. Eclipse complains if we didn't.
+ * But there is nothing to stop this from happening with packages too if they are spread across compile groups.  
+ */
+public class InitParserTest46376 {
+
+}
diff --git a/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/initParserTest46376/SameNameTestClass.java b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/initParserTest46376/SameNameTestClass.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ecdcfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/initParserTest46376/SameNameTestClass.java
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+package initParserTest46376;
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c)  2003 IBM Corporation and others.
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials 
+ * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
+ * 
+ * Contributors:
+ *     IBM Corporation - initial API and implementation
+ *******************************************************************************/
+/*
+ *  $RCSfile: SameNameTestClass.java,v $
+ *  $Revision: 1.1 $  $Date: 2003/11/11 16:27:40 $ 
+ */
+/**
+ * This is to test for defect [46376].
+ * 
+ * SameName test. This is test where you have this:
+ * 	InitParserTest46376.SameNameTestClass.java
+ * 	InitParserTest46376.java
+ * 
+ * and
+ * 
+ * 	new org.eclipse.jem.tests.proxy.initParser.SameNameTestClass.RealClass()
+ * 
+ * Before [46376] the Static parser would find SameNameTestClass.java instead of the RealClass and would of failed.
+ * To compile in Eclipse we need to have one of the classes be in the default package. Eclipse complains if we didn't.
+ * But there is nothing to stop this from happening with packages too if they are spread across compile groups.  
+ */
+public class SameNameTestClass {
+	
+	public boolean equals(Object other) {
+		// To make test easier, we simply looking if both of same type.
+		return other != null && other.getClass() == SameNameTestClass.class;
+	}
+
+}
diff --git a/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/InitParserSuite.java b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/InitParserSuite.java
index ea74fa5..1756797 100644
--- a/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/InitParserSuite.java
+++ b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/InitParserSuite.java
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
  *******************************************************************************/
 /*
  *  $RCSfile: InitParserSuite.java,v $
- *  $Revision: 1.2 $  $Date: 2003/10/27 17:32:36 $ 
+ *  $Revision: 1.3 $  $Date: 2003/11/11 16:27:40 $ 
  */
 import junit.framework.Test;
 import junit.framework.TestSuite;
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@
 		CharTest.class,
 		JFCTest.class,
 		BorderTest.class,
-		OverloadingTest.class
+		OverloadingTest.class,
+		SameName46376Test.class
 		                               } ;
 	public static String pkgName = "org.eclipse.jem.tests.proxy.initParser" ;
 	    
diff --git a/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/SameName46376Test.java b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/SameName46376Test.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e3c1c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/org.eclipse.jem.tests/javatests/org/eclipse/jem/tests/proxy/initParser/SameName46376Test.java
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+package org.eclipse.jem.tests.proxy.initParser;
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c)  2003 IBM Corporation and others.
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials 
+ * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
+ * 
+ * Contributors:
+ *     IBM Corporation - initial API and implementation
+ *******************************************************************************/
+/*
+ *  $RCSfile: SameName46376Test.java,v $
+ *  $Revision: 1.1 $  $Date: 2003/11/11 16:27:40 $ 
+ */
+ 
+/**
+ * This is to test for defect [46376].
+ * 
+ * SameName test. This is test where you have this:
+ * 	InitParserTest46376.SameNameTestClass.java
+ * 	InitParserTest46376.java
+ * 
+ * and
+ * 
+ * 	new org.eclipse.jem.tests.proxy.initParser.SameNameTestClass.RealClass()
+ * 
+ * Before [46376] the Static parser would find SameNameTestClass.java instead of the RealClass and would of failed.
+ * To compile in Eclipse we need to have one of the classes be in the default package. Eclipse complains if we didn't.
+ * But there is nothing to stop this from happening with packages too if they are spread across compile groups.  
+ */
+public class SameName46376Test extends AbstractInitParserTestCase {
+	
+	public SameName46376Test(String name) {
+		super(name);
+	}	
+
+	public void test46376() throws Throwable {
+		testHelper.testInitString("new initParserTest46376.SameNameTestClass()", new initParserTest46376.SameNameTestClass());
+	}
+}