blob: 8871fab8e2f648d4d7ef66443ac20da8f3a30500 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>WTP PMC Minutes for April 12, 2005 Conference Call</title>
</head>
<body
alink="#ff0000"
bgcolor="#ffffff"
link="#0000ee"
text="#000000"
vlink="#551a8b">
<table
border="0"
cellpadding="2"
cellspacing="5"
width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td
colspan="2"
align="left"
bgcolor="#0080c0"
valign="top"><b> <font
color="#ffffff"
face="Arial,Helvetica">PMC Conference Call - April 12, 2005</font></b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table
border="0"
cellpadding="2"
cellspacing="5"
width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>WTP PMC Minutes for April 12, 2005 Conference Call</p>
Attending: Tim Wagner [TW], David Williams [DW], Arthur Ryman [AR], Dominique De Vito [DD], Christophe Ney
[CN], Jochen Krause [JK], Naci Dai [ND] Others: Lawrence Mandel (representing WTP community) [LM]
<h1>WTP PMC Minutes for April 12, 2005 Conference Call</h1>
<h2>Procedural matters - None</h2>
<h2>Community [LM]</h2>
<ul>
<li>EclipseWorld tutorial proposal in flight.</li>
<li>AR created presentation archive – see email on WTP list. This is intended to be a repository
for presentation materials.</li>
<li>AR talking at Colorado Software Summit on Web Services development in Eclipse and WSDL 2.0.</li>
<li>Help system: successful internal build; should be incorporated into this week’s I-build.
Requested Bugzilla “documentation” component (PMC approved request). Will be contacting BEA for help
with documentation content work.</li>
</ul>
[PMC members only for the remaining portion of the meeting]
<h2>API Review</h2>
<ul>
<li>PMC reviewed API statistics</li>
<li>j2ee.core component identified as not making sufficient progress; the bulk of its models will
need to be turned provisional. Potential migration of flexible project model to platform in 3.2 is a
possible stumbling block in finalizing API in that area.</li>
<li>Clarified renaming/repackaging strategy to be complete by end of M4.</li>
<li>Continued progress on removing unintended APIs: dropped from 4,326 to 3,349. Overall metric for
4/11 build is 59.</li>
<li>Summary from April 11th build report: 35% JUnit coverage, 95% JavaDoc coverage, 9/14 overview
docs. See <a
href='http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/N-N20050411-200504111848/apitools/api-progress.html'>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/N-N20050411-200504111848/apitools/api-progress.html</a>.
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Requirements Group Report [JK]</h2>
<ul>
<li>No news to report; will begin including this in the agenda on a bi-weekly basis.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Architecture Group Report [DW]</h2>
<ul>
<li>Validation framework API deferred.</li>
<li>XML resolver/catalog API deferred.</li>
<li>See flexible project model notes above.</li>
<li>Separate XERCES plugin build likely this week.</li>
<li>XML and WSDL dependency on JDT should be removed this week.</li>
<li>GEM’s M6 readiness is late; may cause us to introduce a late dependency change into our own
build.</li>
</ul>
<h2>XPDL Proposal and Discussion of WTP Criteria for Submissions [JK]</h2>
<ul>
<li>AR: standard body must be recognized, but standard must also be popular and open source runtime
available, and standard must be in scope.</li>
<li>AR: Criteria for standards body: open to new members, broad industry participation,
established/history.</li>
<li>CN: Maturity and adoption of standard should be part of our criteria.</li>
<li>ND: XPDL and BPEL would be better placed in a technology project; too far from general audience
of WTP.</li>
<li>PMC resolved to suggest a technology project, but agreed to review the proposal when written to
review vis-à-vis WTP charter.</li>
</ul>
<h2>WTP 1.0 Product Forums [JK]</h2>
<ul>
<li>Idea would be to get interested parties to build on WTP 1.0, drive adoption, and gather
requirements for 1.1.</li>
<li>Timeframe: post 1.0 ship (easier to do once churn stops).</li>
<li>Requirements group will take this on and report back to the PMC when proposal is complete.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Eclipse Booth at JavaOne [TW]</h2>
<ul>
<li>CN, DD, and TW will assist with staffing the booth; TW to respond to Ian.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Creation of XSL Component [DW]</h2>
<ul>
<li>Discussed contribution request (for 1.1; not on table for 1.0 release).</li>
<li>Normal committership process must be followed, despite size of contribution.</li>
<li>Can be made part of build so that it’s available for evaluation by committers and rest of
community.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Upcoming Milestone Build Process Ownership [DW]</h2>
<ul>
<li>Setting dates / versions for upstream components, driving test plans with component leads,
evaluation of candidates and convergence toward acceptance.</li>
<li>AR offered to support DW in this effort.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Build Status Reports [ND]</h2>
<ul>
<li>New distribution list will be set up for build reports.</li>
<li>Progress on build status/result reporting – compile failures now attached to email.</li>
<li>Will increase number of warmup builds.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Status Update on Ongoing Projects [AR]</h2>
<ul>
<li>Janet making progress on 3rd party content agreements; ETA is M4.</li>
<li>AXE will be going into the Lepido technology project.</li>
<li>DTP: Sybase and others meeting with IBM to go over code and make progress (see email to PMC).</li>
</ul>
<h2>Action Items:</h2>
<ul>
<li>TW: finalize dates for release reviews with EMO (week of June 20th being discussed)</li>
</ul>
<small>Minutes taken by Tim Wagner, April 12, 2005</small></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#160;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>