development/pmc_call_notes/2006-01-10.html - www.eclipse.org/webtools - Git at Google

 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
 <head>
 <title>WTP PMC Minutes for January 10, 2006 Conference Call</title>
 </head>
 <body
     alink="#ff0000"
     bgcolor="#ffffff"
     link="#0000ee"
     text="#000000"
     vlink="#551a8b">
 <table
     border="0"
     cellpadding="2"
     cellspacing="5"
     width="100%">
     <tbody>
         <tr>
             <td
                 colspan="2"
                 align="left"
                 bgcolor="#0080c0"
                 valign="top"><b> <font
                 color="#ffffff"
                 face="Arial,Helvetica">PMC Conference Call - January 10, 2006</font></b></td>
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 </table>
 <table
     border="0"
     cellpadding="2"
     cellspacing="5"
     width="100%">
     <tbody>
         <tr>
             <td>Attending: Tim Wagner [TW], Arthur Ryman [AR], Raghunathan Srinivasan [RS], Naci Dai [ND], David
             Williams [DW], Jochen Krause [JK], Lawrence Mandel [LM] <!--PMC MEMBERS NOT PRESENT ON THIS CALL:
 -->
             <h1>WTP PMC Minutes for January 10, 2006 Conference Call</h1>
             <h2>Community Update and 1.0 Status</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>Effort to get tutorials correct/up to date - some are updated; others still require
                 improvements, and will probably complete in time for 1.0.1.</li>
                 <li>Site watch update - no updates; commentary seems to have died down on the release.</li>
                 <li>Lawrence to check on the "Top 10" download list - because of the formula used to compute these,
                 it will be difficult for us to get into the club; Lawrence has a bug open to track this.</li>
                 <li>WTP logo update - "contest" has been initiated and several rounds of improvements have occurred
                 on initial set of logo proposals. Will add some to our home page to help garner interest/awareness.</li>
                 <li>Lawrence tracking EclipseCon involvement for WTP; short talks are up next.</li>
                 <li>How should we correlate adopter bug fixes to 1.0.1 M-builds for the community? Automated
                 reports are underway (see below), but there are relatively few bug fixes targeted for 1.0.1; manual
                 advertisement seems appropriate for this release.</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>1.0 Update Site [DW]</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>Update site ready to go live; David to announce (probably later today).</li>
                 <li>Updating from 0.7 to 1.0 remains problematic; update to a "fresh" platform works correctly.
                 (Manifests as refusal to update but does not corrupt the existing 0.7.x installation.) May not be able
                 to make sufficient headway on these problems to solve the issue for 0.7.</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>1.0.1 Status [DW]</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>M-build progress this week - smoke test due today; declaration expected by noon tomorrow (Wed);
                 on track for that so far.</li>
                 <li>Naci's experiment with Eclipse-hosted build process: some concerns raised over accuracy of the
                 so-called "EMF approach": looks at CVS comments and compares them against Bugzilla state, based on time
                 (rather than release-to-build info). We can generate this report now; will consider for inclusion in
                 next week's build and investigate the accuracy of the output.</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>Callisto / 1.5 Plans</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>Progress on M4 - we're getting clean compiles, but a few failing JUnit tests (due to EMF issues
                 on a 1.4 VM). This is creating a risk in our goal of completing this by Friday (we may need to declare
                 with this as a known issue).</li>
                 <li>Progress on 3.2 build system migration: should be straightforward, but may not complete in time
                 for M4.</li>
                 <li>Build machine at eclipse.org setup underway; Denis helping Naci on this.</li>
                 <li>Incubating projects that need graduation into WTP (JSF and EJB 3.0) - incubation exit criteria
                 need to be developed (test coverage, documentation, API progress, IP cleanliness, etc. - basically the
                 requirements from the EMO release review).</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>Requirements</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>1.5 component-level plans are being entered into Bugzilla by the leads.</li>
                 <li>Will begin review of enhancement requests for 1.5 prioritization.</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>JSF</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>Sybase contribution in flight; some concern over whether test cases and documentation will be
                 included in the contribution.</li>
                 <li>1.5 Release train plan: planning to exit incubation and ship as part of WTP 1.5/Callisto. Will
                 need to join milestones as part of M5 (early March release).</li>
                 <li>Need to begin working to meet incubation exit / WTP release review criteria.</li>
                 <li>Committer approval process begun for Jean Choi.</li>
             </ul>
             <h2>Action Items</h2>
             <ul>
                 <li>[TW] Check with Janet on logo legal/IP issues.</li>
                 <li>[TW] Check with Bjorn on incubation exit versus WTP release review - are there two reviews or
                 just one?</li>
                 <li>[TW/DW] (held over) Learn more about PHP project and its connection to WTP.</li>
             </ul>
             <small>Minutes taken by Tim Wagner, January 10, 2006</small></td>
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 </table>
 </body>
 </html>
	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
	<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<head>
	<title>WTP PMC Minutes for January 10, 2006 Conference Call</title>
	</head>
	<body
	alink="#ff0000"
	bgcolor="#ffffff"
	link="#0000ee"
	text="#000000"
	vlink="#551a8b">
	<table
	border="0"
	cellpadding="2"
	cellspacing="5"
	width="100%">
	<tbody>
	<tr>
	<td
	colspan="2"
	align="left"
	bgcolor="#0080c0"
	valign="top"><b> <font
	color="#ffffff"
	face="Arial,Helvetica">PMC Conference Call - January 10, 2006</font></b></td>
	</tr>
	</tbody>
	</table>
	<table
	border="0"
	cellpadding="2"
	cellspacing="5"
	width="100%">
	<tbody>
	<tr>
	<td>Attending: Tim Wagner [TW], Arthur Ryman [AR], Raghunathan Srinivasan [RS], Naci Dai [ND], David
	Williams [DW], Jochen Krause [JK], Lawrence Mandel [LM] <!--PMC MEMBERS NOT PRESENT ON THIS CALL:
	-->
	<h1>WTP PMC Minutes for January 10, 2006 Conference Call</h1>
	<h2>Community Update and 1.0 Status</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>Effort to get tutorials correct/up to date - some are updated; others still require
	improvements, and will probably complete in time for 1.0.1.</li>
	<li>Site watch update - no updates; commentary seems to have died down on the release.</li>
	<li>Lawrence to check on the "Top 10" download list - because of the formula used to compute these,
	it will be difficult for us to get into the club; Lawrence has a bug open to track this.</li>
	<li>WTP logo update - "contest" has been initiated and several rounds of improvements have occurred
	on initial set of logo proposals. Will add some to our home page to help garner interest/awareness.</li>
	<li>Lawrence tracking EclipseCon involvement for WTP; short talks are up next.</li>
	<li>How should we correlate adopter bug fixes to 1.0.1 M-builds for the community? Automated
	reports are underway (see below), but there are relatively few bug fixes targeted for 1.0.1; manual
	advertisement seems appropriate for this release.</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>1.0 Update Site [DW]</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>Update site ready to go live; David to announce (probably later today).</li>
	<li>Updating from 0.7 to 1.0 remains problematic; update to a "fresh" platform works correctly.
	(Manifests as refusal to update but does not corrupt the existing 0.7.x installation.) May not be able
	to make sufficient headway on these problems to solve the issue for 0.7.</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>1.0.1 Status [DW]</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>M-build progress this week - smoke test due today; declaration expected by noon tomorrow (Wed);
	on track for that so far.</li>
	<li>Naci's experiment with Eclipse-hosted build process: some concerns raised over accuracy of the
	so-called "EMF approach": looks at CVS comments and compares them against Bugzilla state, based on time
	(rather than release-to-build info). We can generate this report now; will consider for inclusion in
	next week's build and investigate the accuracy of the output.</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>Callisto / 1.5 Plans</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>Progress on M4 - we're getting clean compiles, but a few failing JUnit tests (due to EMF issues
	on a 1.4 VM). This is creating a risk in our goal of completing this by Friday (we may need to declare
	with this as a known issue).</li>
	<li>Progress on 3.2 build system migration: should be straightforward, but may not complete in time
	for M4.</li>
	<li>Build machine at eclipse.org setup underway; Denis helping Naci on this.</li>
	<li>Incubating projects that need graduation into WTP (JSF and EJB 3.0) - incubation exit criteria
	need to be developed (test coverage, documentation, API progress, IP cleanliness, etc. - basically the
	requirements from the EMO release review).</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>Requirements</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>1.5 component-level plans are being entered into Bugzilla by the leads.</li>
	<li>Will begin review of enhancement requests for 1.5 prioritization.</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>JSF</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>Sybase contribution in flight; some concern over whether test cases and documentation will be
	included in the contribution.</li>
	<li>1.5 Release train plan: planning to exit incubation and ship as part of WTP 1.5/Callisto. Will
	need to join milestones as part of M5 (early March release).</li>
	<li>Need to begin working to meet incubation exit / WTP release review criteria.</li>
	<li>Committer approval process begun for Jean Choi.</li>
	</ul>
	<h2>Action Items</h2>
	<ul>
	<li>[TW] Check with Janet on logo legal/IP issues.</li>
	<li>[TW] Check with Bjorn on incubation exit versus WTP release review - are there two reviews or
	just one?</li>
	<li>[TW/DW] (held over) Learn more about PHP project and its connection to WTP.</li>
	</ul>
	<small>Minutes taken by Tim Wagner, January 10, 2006</small></td>
	</tr>
	</tbody>
	</table>
	</body>
	</html>