HEAD - modified test case for wontfix 107931
diff --git a/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model/src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/ReconcilerTests.java b/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model/src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/ReconcilerTests.java
index ec52b6d..d1ec30d 100644
--- a/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model/src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/ReconcilerTests.java
+++ b/org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.model/src/org/eclipse/jdt/core/tests/model/ReconcilerTests.java
@@ -3482,7 +3482,9 @@
}
// https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
-public void _test1001() throws CoreException, InterruptedException, IOException {
+// won't be fixed; this test watches the current behavior in case we change
+// our mind
+public void test1001() throws CoreException, InterruptedException, IOException {
try {
// Resources creation
String sources[] = new String[3];
@@ -3537,12 +3539,13 @@
"----------\n" +
"1. ERROR in /P3/Y.java (at line 1)\n" +
" class Y implements I {\n" +
- " ^\n" +
- "The type Y must implement the inherited abstract method I.bar(X)\n" +
- "----------\n" +
- "2. ERROR in /P3/Y.java (at line 1)\n" +
- " class Y implements I {\n" +
- " ^\n" +
+ " ^\n" +
+// we miss the first diagnostic - see justification in bugzilla
+// "The type Y must implement the inherited abstract method I.bar(X)\n" +
+// "----------\n" +
+// "2. ERROR in /P3/Y.java (at line 1)\n" +
+// " class Y implements I {\n" +
+// " ^\n" +
"The type Y must implement the inherited abstract method I.foo()\n" +
"----------\n"
);
